Arctic Sea Ice Road Maps

Knowledge Gaps

Physical science / mechanism

  • What regions would have the biggest potential for albedo change (Seitz 2011)?
  • How would the foam impact ocean circulation, chemistry, biology (Gabriel et al. 2017)?
  • Would targeted small-scale deployments have an outsized impact? (Suggestion in Cvijanovic et al. 2015 for surface albedo modification in general.)
  • For local Arctic deployment, what level of albedo is needed to make a difference? (Mentioned in Cvijanovic et al. 2015 for surface albedo modification in general.)
  • More developed ocean-atmospheric feedbacks in models (Mengis et al. 2016).
  • How much would proposed surfactants inhibit ocean CO2 uptake?
  • What regions would have the biggest potential for albedo change (Seitz 2011)?
  • How would the foam impact ocean circulation, chemistry, biology (Gabriel et al. 2017)?
  • Would targeted small-scale deployments have an outsized impact? (Suggestion in Cvijanovic et al. 2015 for surface albedo modification in general.)
  • For local Arctic deployment, what level of albedo is needed to make a difference? (Mentioned in Cvijanovic et al. 2015 for surface albedo modification in general.)
  • More developed ocean-atmospheric feedbacks in models (Mengis et al. 2016).
  • How much would proposed surfactants inhibit ocean CO2 uptake?
  • What regions would have the biggest potential for albedo change (Seitz 2011).
  • How would the foam impact ocean circulation, chemistry, biology (Gabriel et al. 2017)?
  • Would targeted small-scale deployments have an outsized impact? (suggestion in Cvijanovic et al. 2015 for surface albedo modification in general.)
  • For local Arctic deployment, what level of albedo is needed to make a difference? (mentioned in Cvijanovic et al. 2015 for surface albedo modification in general)
  • More developed ocean-atmospheric feedbacks in models (Mengis et al. 2016).
  • How much would proposed surfactants inhibit ocean CO2 uptake?
  • What regions would have the biggest potential for albedo change (Seitz 2011).
  • How would the foam impact ocean circulation, chemistry, biology? (Gabriel et al. 2017)
  • Would targeted small-scale deployments have an outsized impact? (suggestion in Cvijanovic et al. 2015 for surface albedo modification in general)
  • For local Arctic deployment, what level of albedo is needed to make a difference? (mentioned in Cvijanovic et al. 2015 for surface albedo modification in general)
  • More developed ocean-atmospheric feedbacks in models (Mengis et al. 2016)
  • How much would proposed surfactants inhibit ocean CO2 uptake?

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Engineering needs (technical feasibility)

  • For deployment in the Arctic Ocean, if the area of sea ice loss increases over time that presents a technical challenge of deployment as deployment area would increase (Mengis et al. 2016).
  • There is little known about how bubble lifetime varies with different types and concentrations of surfactants and how they are affected by turbulent mixing in the surface ocean (Crook et al. 2016).
  • Could a system be developed to integrate microbubble technology for fuel efficiency with that for albedo modification on to existing ships (Crook et al. 2016)?
  • What non-toxic surfactant candidates?
  • For deployment in the Arctic Ocean, if the area of sea ice loss increases over time that presents a technical challenge of deployment as deployment area would increase (Mengis et al. 2016).
  • There is little known about how bubble lifetime varies with different types and concentrations of surfactants and how they are affected by turbulent mixing in the surface ocean (Crook et al. 2016).
  • Could a system be developed to integrate microbubble technology for fuel efficiency with that for albedo modification on to existing ships (Crook et al. 2016)?
  • What non-toxic surfactant candidates?
  • For deployment in the Arctic Ocean, if the area of sea ice loss increases over time that presents a technical challenge of deployment as deployment area would increase (Mengis et al. 2016).
  • There is little known about how bubble lifetime varies with different types and concentrations of surfactants and how they are affected by turbulent mixing in the surface ocean (Crook et al. 2016).
  • Could a system be developed to integrate microbubble technology for fuel efficiency with that for albedo modification on to existing ships (Crook et al. 2016)?
  • What non-toxic surfactant candidates?
  • For deployment in the Arctic Ocean, if the area of sea ice loss increases over time that presents a technical challenge of deployment as deployment area would increase (Mengis et al. 2016).
  • There is little known about how bubble lifetime varies with different types and concentrations of surfactants and how they are affected by turbulent mixing in the surface ocean (Crook et al. 2016).
  • Could a system be developed to integrate microbubble technology for fuel efficiency with that for albedo modification on to existing ships (Crook et al. 2016)?
  • What are candidate non-toxic surfactants?

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Environmental risks / benefits

Version published: 
  • How does bubble addition impact biogeochemistry and phytoplankton populations?
  • How does bubble addition impact biogeochemistry and phytoplankton populations?

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Social risks / benefits

Version published: 
  • Would potential deployment locations be near human-inhabited areas?
  • Need assessment of societal risks and benefits including community engagement.
  • Would potential deployment locations be near human-inhabited areas?
  • Need assessment of societal risks and benefits including community engagement.
  • Would potential deployment locations be near human-inhabited areas?

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Governance

Version published: 
  • There is need for an inclusive governance approach that incorporates stakeholder concerns in the design and deployment of approaches and effectively communicates risk (Bennett et al. 2022).
  • Can Indigenous rights and perspectives be incorporated in governance of ocean-based climate solutions when solutions are implemented in the name of global environmental protection (Chuffart et al. 2023)?
  • There is need for an inclusive governance approach that incorporates stakeholder concerns in the design and deployment of approaches and effectively communicates risk (Bennett et al. 2022).
  • Can Indigenous rights and perspectives be incorporated in governance of ocean-based climate solutions when solutions are implemented in the name of global environmental protection (Chuffart et al. 2023)?
  • There is need for an inclusive governance approach that incorporates stakeholder concerns in the design and deployment of approaches and effectively communicates risk (Bennett et al. 2022).
  • Can Indigenous rights and perspectives be incorporated in governance of ocean-based climate solutions when solutions are implemented in the name of global environmental protection? (Chuffart et al. 2023)

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Help advance Arctic Sea Ice road maps. Submit Comments or Content