Low-Carbon Seaweed-Based Product Road Maps

State of approach

Overview

Version published: 

In 2023, the apparel sector generated 944 million tons of global greenhouse gas emissions, almost 2% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). Consumer desire is increasing for sustainable fashion that reduces waste and uses low-carbon alternatives to conventional fibers such as cotton and polyester. Seaweed-based fabrics could be part of the solution. In addition to potentially reducing emissions if substituting for conventional fabrics, they can also potentially reduce pressures on the use of  water and arable land. Seaweed-based alginate and cellulose fibers have desirable properties for fabrics, are currently used in medical applications such as wound dressings and are gaining attention in garment and furniture fabrics, hygiene products, and more.

This chapter covers the state of science, policies, and markets underpinning seaweed-based fiber production for use in fabrics, covering process steps after seaweed biomass is harvest and before the fiber is woven into a fabric. For seaweed cultivation and dewatering/drying, refer to the “Cultivation and Dewatering/Drying” chapter. Figure 1 summarizes the lifecycle elements discussed below.

Cleaned, dewatered, and dried seaweed is milled into a fine powder to increase surface area, then soaked to break down cell walls and remove compounds like fats and proteins that can weaken fiber quality. The pre-treated material is then refined into either alginate or cellulose intermediates: sodium alginate is extracted and formed into a spinnable solution, while cellulose is isolated and regenerated into filaments. Alginate routes typically spin the alginate into filaments (or mold it into sheets for bio-leather). Cellulose routes wet-spin regenerated cellulose into fibers similar to plant-derived cellulose, which are the most common fibers used for “seaweed fabrics” in medical, home, and fashion contexts.

Pre-processing

After being cleaned, dewatered, and dried, fresh seaweed is milled into a fine powder to increase surface area for subsequent soaking treatments. This can range from simple integration into existing soaks (e.g., cellulose) to complex acid or alkaline chemical baths (e.g., alginate). The goal is to dissolve cell walls and remove compounds that can degrade fiber quality (e.g., fats, proteins; Saji et al., 2022).

Processing

The processing stage is where pre-treated seaweed powder is refined to generate desired alginate/cellulose filaments or gels which are then spun into fibers or molded into sheets, respectively.

Alginate fibers/gels

Alginate fibers are created by spinning extracted sodium alginate into filaments; sodium alginate can also be molded into sheets to make bio-leather. Alginate fibers are very good at soaking up liquid and turning into a soft gel, which makes them well-suited for one-time use products like medical bandages or paper towels. However, this quality limits their use in everyday clothes and water-resistant use-cases (Qin, 2008; World Bank, 2023).

Cellulose fibers

Seaweed-based cellulose fibers are made by isolating glucose-based cellulose and regenerating it into filaments, then wet-spinning into fibers. The fibers are similar to those found in terrestrial plants, and are used to produce the “seaweed fabrics” seen today (Gregersen, 2019; Baghel et al., 2021).

Post-processing

Seaweed-based fibers are then blended with other fibers for further manufacturing into fabrics for different use-cases (e.g., medical, home, fashion; see Figure 1) and scale (e.g., personal use, fashion brand, commercial-scale).

Figure 1. FTC x SeaCell collaboration fashion campaign, using SEACELL Cashmere. Source: SMARTFIBER AG | SEACELL
In 2023, the apparel sector generated 944 million tons of global greenhouse gas emissions, almost 2% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). Consumer desire is increasing for sustainable fashion that reduces waste and uses low-carbon alternatives to conventional fibers such as cotton and polyester. Seaweed-based fabrics could be part of the solution. In addition to potentially reducing emissions if substituting for conventional fabrics, they can also potentially reduce pressures on the use of  water and arable land. Seaweed-based alginate and cellulose fibers have desirable properties for fabrics, are currently used in medical applications such as wound dressings and are gaining attention in garment and furniture fabrics, hygiene products, and more. This chapter covers the state of science, policies, and markets underpinning seaweed-based fiber production for use in fabrics, covering process steps after seaweed biomass is harvest and before the fiber is woven into a fabric. For seaweed cultivation and dewatering/drying, refer to the “Cultivation and Dewatering/Drying” chapter. Figure 1 summarizes the lifecycle elements discussed below. Cleaned, dewatered, and dried seaweed is milled into a fine powder to increase surface area, then soaked to break down cell walls and remove compounds like fats and proteins that can weaken fiber quality. The pre-treated material is then refined into either alginate or cellulose intermediates: sodium alginate is extracted and formed into a spinnable solution, while cellulose is isolated and regenerated into filaments. Alginate routes typically spin the alginate into filaments (or mold it into sheets for bio-leather). Cellulose routes wet-spin regenerated cellulose into fibers similar to plant-derived cellulose, which are the most common fibers used for “seaweed fabrics” in medical, home, and fashion contexts.

Pre-processing

After being cleaned, dewatered, and dried, fresh seaweed is milled into a fine powder to increase surface area for subsequent soaking treatments. This can range from simple integration into existing soaks (e.g., cellulose) to complex acid or alkaline chemical baths (e.g., alginate). The goal is to dissolve cell walls and remove compounds that can degrade fiber quality (e.g., fats, proteins; Saji et al., 2022).

Processing

The processing stage is where pre-treated seaweed powder is refined to generate desired alginate/cellulose filaments or gels which are then spun into fibers or molded into sheets, respectively.

Alginate fibers/gels

Alginate fibers are created by spinning extracted sodium alginate into filaments; sodium alginate can also be molded into sheets to make bio-leather. Alginate fibers are very good at soaking up liquid and turning into a soft gel, which makes them well-suited for one-time use products like medical bandages or paper towels. However, this quality limits their use in everyday clothes and water-resistant use-cases (Qin, 2008; World Bank, 2023).

Cellulose fibers

Seaweed-based cellulose fibers are made by isolating glucose-based cellulose and regenerating it into filaments, then wet-spinning into fibers. The fibers are similar to those found in terrestrial plants, and are used to produce the “seaweed fabrics” seen today (Gregersen, 2019; Baghel et al., 2021).

Post-processing

Seaweed-based fibers are then blended with other fibers for further manufacturing into fabrics for different use-cases (e.g., medical, home, fashion; see Figure 1) and scale (e.g., personal use, fashion brand, commercial-scale). [caption id="attachment_12409" align="aligncenter" width="1430"] Figure 1. FTC x SeaCell collaboration fashion campaign, using SEACELL Cashmere. Source: SMARTFIBER AG | SEACELL[/caption]
In 2023, the apparel sector generated 944 million tons of global greenhouse gas emissions, almost 2% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). Consumer desire is increasing for sustainable fashion that reduces waste and uses low-carbon alternatives to conventional fibers such as cotton and polyester. Seaweed-based fabrics could be part of the solution. In addition to potentially reducing emissions if substituting for conventional fabrics, they can also potentially reduce pressures on the use of  water and arable land. Seaweed-based alginate and cellulose fibers have desirable properties for fabrics, are currently used in medical applications such as wound dressings and are gaining attention in garment and furniture fabrics, hygiene products, and more. This chapter covers the state of science, policies, and markets underpinning seaweed-based fiber production for use in fabrics, covering process steps after seaweed biomass is harvest and before the fiber is woven into a fabric. For seaweed cultivation and dewatering/drying, refer to the “Cultivation and Dewatering/Drying” chapter. Figure 1 summarizes the lifecycle elements discussed below. Cleaned, dewatered, and dried seaweed is milled into a fine powder to increase surface area, then soaked to break down cell walls and remove compounds like fats and proteins that can weaken fiber quality. The pre-treated material is then refined into either alginate or cellulose intermediates: sodium alginate is extracted and formed into a spinnable solution, while cellulose is isolated and regenerated into filaments. Alginate routes typically spin the alginate into filaments (or mold it into sheets for bio-leather). Cellulose routes wet-spin regenerated cellulose into fibers similar to plant-derived cellulose, which are the most common fibers used for “seaweed fabrics” in medical, home, and fashion contexts.

Pre-processing

After being cleaned, dewatered, and dried, fresh seaweed is milled into a fine powder to increase surface area for subsequent soaking treatments. This can range from simple integration into existing soaks (e.g., cellulose) to complex acid or alkaline chemical baths (e.g., alginate). The goal is to dissolve cell walls and remove compounds that can degrade fiber quality (e.g., fats, proteins; Saji et al., 2022).

Processing

The processing stage is where pre-treated seaweed powder is refined to generate desired alginate/cellulose filaments or gels which are then spun into fibers or molded into sheets, respectively.

Alginate fibers/gels

Alginate fibers are created by spinning extracted sodium alginate into filaments; sodium alginate can also be molded into sheets to make bio-leather. Alginate fibers are very good at soaking up liquid and turning into a soft gel, which makes them well-suited for medical bandages. However, this quality limits their use in everyday clothes and water-resistant use-cases (Qin, 2008; World Bank, 2023).

Cellulose fibers

Seaweed-based cellulose fibers are made by isolating glucose-based cellulose and regenerating it into filaments, then wet-spinning into fibers. The fibers are similar to those found in terrestrial plants, and are used to produce the “seaweed fabrics” seen today (Gregersen, 2019; Baghel et al., 2021).

Post-processing

Seaweed-based fibers are then blended with other fibers for further manufacturing into fabrics for different use-cases (e.g., medical, home, fashion; see Figure 1) and scale (e.g., personal use, fashion brand, commercial-scale). [caption id="attachment_12409" align="aligncenter" width="1430"] Figure 1. FTC x SeaCell collaboration fashion campaign, using SEACELL Cashmere. Source: SMARTFIBER AG | SEACELL[/caption]

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Science, Technology and Engineering

Species Selection, Cultivation and Harvesting

Species Selection

There are over 10,000 species of seaweed that vary substantially in their life cycles, impacting the concentration of compounds suitable for fiber production. Given the emerging exploration of seaweed-based fibers, seaweed species selected for production have been limited to regional seaweed supply. Species high in cellulose or alginate are desirable because the fibers produced are similar in chemical composition, mechanical performance, and tactile properties to conventional fibers (e.g., cellulose), or are already extracted in high volumes for other industries (e.g., alginates) (Felgueiras et al., 2021). Common products using seaweed-based cellulose have <10% inclusion, but with alginates it can increase to as much as 100%. Table 1 summarizes how seaweed-based fibers are commonly used and by what companies.

Alginate & Cellulose AdditiveAlginate

Seaweed Species Fiber Production Type Use Cases Example Commercial Products (seaweed inclusion % if provided)
Saccharina latissima (Sugar Kelp) Alginate & Cellulose Yoga and loungewear prototypes TaraTekstil (aimed for >70% seaweed)
Durvillaea antarctica Alginate Home and fashion fabrics Biodegradable “sea leather” alternatives
Lithothamnium calcareum Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed)
Laminaria digitata Alginate Medical wound dressings Celluheal
Chamfond biotech
Algicell
Ascophyllum nodosum Alginate & Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments
Shirts/undergarments
Fashion collections
SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed)
Vitadylan™
(8–10% seaweed)
Tabinotabi (uses SeaCell, ~4% seaweed)

Table 1. Examples of species used in fiber production, use cases, and associated companies/institutions with publicly available records of seaweed inclusion in the product.

Cultivation

For more information on the cultivation approaches, see the “Cultivation and Drying Considerations” chapter.

Harvesting

Currently the most common fibers made with seaweed (e.g., SeaCell) are sourced from wild harvests, which can produce variable quality. This is also seen in studies with cultivated seaweed species – for example, Ocean Rainforest has shown that the concentrations of alginates and cellulose can vary with seasonality (Gregersen, 2019).

Processing information is proprietary in most cases, but general processing methods and active R&D are detailed below for alginate and cellulose-based fiber production (summarized in Figure 3).

Processing and Post-processing

Alginate

Following preprocessing, seaweed is added to a tank with an alkaline solution (e.g., sodium carbonate). Consistent heating (e.g., 40°C for three hours) then converts the seaweed’s alginic acid to sodium alginate, the desired material. After conversion, the mixture is filtered to separate the solid fraction (containing materials like cellulose, fucoidan, laminarin) from the liquid fraction containing sodium alginate. Ethanol-induced precipitation purifies the sodium alginate for downstream processing (Gregersen, 2019; Managò, 2022; World Bank, 2023; Figure 2A).

Downstream Processing: Alginate fiber

Wet spinning mixes sodium alginate powder with water and soluble additives. The solution is passed through a spinneret or nozzle within a coagulation bath filled with a salt solution to link the polymer chains, producing fiber. Multiple rounds of washing, stretching, and drying occur to shape the fibers before they are cut to size for further processing into yarn and fabrics (Bojorges et al., 2023).

Figure 2. Schematic of the wet spinning process to produce fiber filaments and yarn. Source: Textile Learner (2022)
Downstream Processing: Alginate leather

Sodium alginate powder is poured and set into a plasticizer (made of cardboard and/or faux leather) shaped to mimic a leather finish. Once the plaster is completely dried, a pigment-containing hydrogel is poured into the mold cavity and then compressed. Applying calcium chloride then nebulizes the hydrogel, curing the alginate without cracking the material; it also provides a protective patina to the exterior, which can give the material water and microbial resistance (Managò, 2022).

Figure 3. Heating sodium alginate for application to a mold cavity to set as alginate leather. Source: Managó (2022)
Novel alginate extraction methods

More novel methods (e.g., ultrasound-, microwave, or enzyme-assisted extractions; MAE, UAE, EAE, respectively) are also being explored to extract sodium alginate for higher quality and efficiency (Saji et al., 2022; Bojorges et al., 2023). MAE, UAE, and EAE are desirable for industry-scale use due to their specificity in targeting desirable compounds, higher yields compared to traditional methods, and lower environmental impact compared to current commercial methods. Table 2 below summarizes the novel extraction methods and their current readiness.

Innovation What it is / How it works Claimed benefits
Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) Uses microwaves to break cell walls and release compounds in solvent or through vapor distillation Higher yields, less solvent

Can use fresh seaweed

Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) High-frequency waves increase cell porosity, allowing solvent penetration Improved yields, scalable

Does not impact heat-sensitive compounds

Can use fresh seaweed

Enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE) Hydrolytic enzymes break cell walls, releasing cell contents to solvent Lower environmental impact

Table 2. Emerging extraction techniques for seaweed-based fiber production, claimed benefits, and technological readiness/status. Sources: Saji et al., (2022), Bojorges et al. (2023)

Cellulose

Cellulose fiber production occurs primarily through viscose, modal, and lyocell processes and with tree-based feedstock (e.g., eucalyptus, oak, birch; Varnaitė-Žuravliova and Baltušnikaitė-Guzaitienė, 2024). None of the current manufacturing methods incorporates raw seaweed as the dominant material in production. The lyocell process has been most commonly used in producing seaweed-based fibers given the lower environmental impacts of its production (Guo et al., 2021).

Lyocell Process

Dried and ground seaweed is suspended in an amine oxide (surfactants used as stabilizers, thickeners etc.) solution with wood pulp at constant heat. The seaweed suspension is then added to another wood pulp suspension in doses. Dosing occurs at the wood pulp treatment, subsequent cellulose suspension, and at the spinning and filtration stages. The mixture is then filtered, spun, washed, and dried, producing a fiber with approximately 4% seaweed for yarn and fabric manufacturing (Gregersen, 2019).

If seaweed cellulose by-product is used following a prior product extraction process (e.g., after alginate extraction), it can be separated and characterized by whether its chemical composition (e.g., moisture, ash content, viscosity, dissolvability in lyocell solvents) enables further refinement into cellulose fibers (Figure 2B). If so, the by-product is processed using the lyocell method referenced above to purify the cellulose at levels suitable for fiber manufacture, sometimes in multiple rounds after chemical characterization.

The diluted amine oxide can be recycled for future processing batches by purifying and evaporating the water. Research is ongoing to valorize seaweed residues from the hydrocolloid industry as a primary feedstock for cellulose; while the research is being developed for producing films, it could apply to fiber production for fabrics (Jiang et al., 2025).

Figure 2. Flowcharts of how seaweed is added to alginate fiber processing (top) and cellulose fiber processing (bottom). Figure adapted from World Bank (2023) and Gregerson (2019)

Species Selection, Cultivation and Harvesting

Species Selection

There are over 10,000 species of seaweed that vary substantially in their life cycles, impacting the concentration of compounds suitable for fiber production. Given the emerging exploration of seaweed-based fibers, seaweed species selected for production have been limited to regional seaweed supply. Species high in cellulose or alginate are desirable because the fibers produced are similar in chemical composition, mechanical performance, and tactile properties to conventional fibers (e.g., cellulose), or are already extracted in high volumes for other industries (e.g., alginates) (Felgueiras et al., 2021). Common products using seaweed-based cellulose have <10% inclusion, but with alginates it can increase to as much as 100%. Table 1 summarizes how seaweed-based fibers are commonly used and by what companies. Alginate & Cellulose AdditiveAlginate
Seaweed Species Fiber Production Type Use Cases Example Commercial Products (seaweed inclusion % if provided)
Saccharina latissima (Sugar Kelp) Alginate & Cellulose Yoga and loungewear prototypes TaraTekstil (aimed for >70% seaweed)
Durvillaea antarctica Alginate Home and fashion fabrics Biodegradable "sea leather" alternatives
Lithothamnium calcareum Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed)
Laminaria digitata Alginate Medical wound dressings Celluheal Chamfond biotech Algicell
Ascophyllum nodosum Alginate & Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments Shirts/undergarments Fashion collections SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed) Vitadylan™ (8–10% seaweed) Tabinotabi (uses SeaCell, ~4% seaweed)
Table 1. Examples of species used in fiber production, use cases, and associated companies/institutions with publicly available records of seaweed inclusion in the product.

Cultivation

For more information on the cultivation approaches, see the “Cultivation and Drying Considerations” chapter.

Harvesting

Currently the most common fibers made with seaweed (e.g., SeaCell) are sourced from wild harvests, which can produce variable quality. This is also seen in studies with cultivated seaweed species – for example, Ocean Rainforest has shown that the concentrations of alginates and cellulose can vary with seasonality (Gregersen, 2019). Processing information is proprietary in most cases, but general processing methods and active R&D are detailed below for alginate and cellulose-based fiber production (summarized in Figure 3).

Processing and Post-processing

Alginate

Following preprocessing, seaweed is added to a tank with an alkaline solution (e.g., sodium carbonate). Consistent heating (e.g., 40°C for three hours) then converts the seaweed’s alginic acid to sodium alginate, the desired material. After conversion, the mixture is filtered to separate the solid fraction (containing materials like cellulose, fucoidan, laminarin) from the liquid fraction containing sodium alginate. Ethanol-induced precipitation purifies the sodium alginate for downstream processing (Gregersen, 2019; Managò, 2022; World Bank, 2023; Figure 2A).
Downstream Processing: Alginate fiber
Wet spinning mixes sodium alginate powder with water and soluble additives. The solution is passed through a spinneret or nozzle within a coagulation bath filled with a salt solution to link the polymer chains, producing fiber. Multiple rounds of washing, stretching, and drying occur to shape the fibers before they are cut to size for further processing into yarn and fabrics (Bojorges et al., 2023). [caption id="attachment_12414" align="aligncenter" width="418"] Figure 2. Schematic of the wet spinning process to produce fiber filaments and yarn. Source: Textile Learner (2022)[/caption]
Downstream Processing: Alginate leather
Sodium alginate powder is poured and set into a plasticizer (made of cardboard and/or faux leather) shaped to mimic a leather finish. Once the plaster is completely dried, a pigment-containing hydrogel is poured into the mold cavity and then compressed. Applying calcium chloride then nebulizes the hydrogel, curing the alginate without cracking the material; it also provides a protective patina to the exterior, which can give the material water and microbial resistance (Managò, 2022). [caption id="attachment_12416" align="aligncenter" width="540"] Figure 3. Heating sodium alginate for application to a mold cavity to set as alginate leather. Source: Managó (2022)[/caption]
Novel alginate extraction methods
More novel methods (e.g., ultrasound-, microwave, or enzyme-assisted extractions; MAE, UAE, EAE, respectively) are also being explored to extract sodium alginate for higher quality and efficiency (Saji et al., 2022; Bojorges et al., 2023). MAE, UAE, and EAE are desirable for industry-scale use due to their specificity in targeting desirable compounds, higher yields compared to traditional methods, and lower environmental impact compared to current commercial methods. Table 2 below summarizes the novel extraction methods and their current readiness.
Innovation What it is / How it works Claimed benefits
Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) Uses microwaves to break cell walls and release compounds in solvent or through vapor distillation Higher yields, less solvent Can use fresh seaweed
Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) High-frequency waves increase cell porosity, allowing solvent penetration Improved yields, scalable Does not impact heat-sensitive compounds Can use fresh seaweed
Enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE) Hydrolytic enzymes break cell walls, releasing cell contents to solvent Lower environmental impact
Table 2. Emerging extraction techniques for seaweed-based fiber production, claimed benefits, and technological readiness/status. Sources: Saji et al., (2022), Bojorges et al. (2023)

Cellulose

Cellulose fiber production occurs primarily through viscose, modal, and lyocell processes and with tree-based feedstock (e.g., eucalyptus, oak, birch; Varnaitė-Žuravliova and Baltušnikaitė-Guzaitienė, 2024). None of the current manufacturing methods incorporates raw seaweed as the dominant material in production. The lyocell process has been most commonly used in producing seaweed-based fibers given the lower environmental impacts of its production (Guo et al., 2021).
Lyocell Process
Dried and ground seaweed is suspended in an amine oxide (surfactants used as stabilizers, thickeners etc.) solution with wood pulp at constant heat. The seaweed suspension is then added to another wood pulp suspension in doses. Dosing occurs at the wood pulp treatment, subsequent cellulose suspension, and at the spinning and filtration stages. The mixture is then filtered, spun, washed, and dried, producing a fiber with approximately 4% seaweed for yarn and fabric manufacturing (Gregersen, 2019). If seaweed cellulose by-product is used following a prior product extraction process (e.g., after alginate extraction), it can be separated and characterized by whether its chemical composition (e.g., moisture, ash content, viscosity, dissolvability in lyocell solvents) enables further refinement into cellulose fibers (Figure 2B). If so, the by-product is processed using the lyocell method referenced above to purify the cellulose at levels suitable for fiber manufacture, sometimes in multiple rounds after chemical characterization. The diluted amine oxide can be recycled for future processing batches by purifying and evaporating the water. Research is ongoing to valorize seaweed residues from the hydrocolloid industry as a primary feedstock for cellulose; while the research is being developed for producing films, it could apply to fiber production for fabrics (Jiang et al., 2025). [caption id="attachment_12419" align="aligncenter" width="2560"] Figure 2. Flowcharts of how seaweed is added to alginate fiber processing (top) and cellulose fiber processing (bottom). Figure adapted from World Bank (2023) and Gregerson (2019)[/caption]

Species Selection, Cultivation and Harvesting

Species Selection

There are over 10,000 species of seaweed that vary substantially in their life cycles, impacting the concentration of compounds suitable for fiber production. Given the emerging exploration of seaweed-based fibers, seaweed species selected for production have been limited to regional seaweed supply. Species high in cellulose or alginate are desirable because the fibers produced are similar in chemical composition, mechanical performance, and tactile properties to conventional fibers (e.g., cellulose), or are already extracted in high volumes for other industries (e.g., alginates) (Felgueiras et al., 2021). Common products using seaweed-based cellulose have <10% inclusion, but with alginates it can increase to as much as 100%. Table 1 summarizes how seaweed-based fibers are commonly used and by what companies. Alginate & Cellulose AdditiveAlginate
Seaweed Species Fiber Production Type Use Cases Example Commercial Products (seaweed inclusion % if provided)
Saccharina latissima (Sugar Kelp) Alginate & Cellulose Yoga and loungewear prototypes TaraTekstil (aimed for >70% seaweed)
Durvillaea antarctica Alginate Home and fashion fabrics Biodegradable "sea leather" alternatives
Lithothamnium calcareum Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed)
Laminaria digitata Alginate Medical wound dressings Celluheal Chamfond biotech Algicell
Ascophyllum nodosum Alginate & Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments Shirts/undergarments Fashion collections SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed) Vitadylan™ (8–10% seaweed) Tabinotabi (uses SeaCell, ~4% seaweed)
Table 1. Examples of species used in fiber production, use cases, and associated companies/institutions with publicly available records of seaweed inclusion in the product.

Cultivation

For more information on the cultivation approaches, see the “Cultivation Considerations” chapter.

Harvesting

Currently the most common fibers made with seaweed (e.g., SeaCell) are sourced from wild harvests, which can produce variable quality. This is also seen in studies with cultivated seaweed species – for example, Ocean Rainforest has shown that the concentrations of alginates and cellulose can vary with seasonality (Gregersen, 2019). Processing information is proprietary in most cases, but general processing methods and active R&D are detailed below for alginate and cellulose-based fiber production (summarized in Figure 3).

Processing and Post-processing

Alginate

Following preprocessing, seaweed is added to a tank with an alkaline solution (e.g., sodium carbonate). Consistent heating (e.g., 40°C for three hours) then converts the seaweed’s alginic acid to sodium alginate, the desired material. After conversion, the mixture is filtered to separate the solid fraction (containing materials like cellulose, fucoidan, laminarin) from the liquid fraction containing sodium alginate. Ethanol-induced precipitation purifies the sodium alginate for downstream processing (Gregersen, 2019; Managò, 2022; World Bank, 2023; Figure 2A).
Downstream Processing: Alginate fiber
Wet spinning mixes sodium alginate powder with water and soluble additives. The solution is passed through a spinneret or nozzle within a coagulation bath filled with a salt solution to link the polymer chains, producing fiber. Multiple rounds of washing, stretching, and drying occur to shape the fibers before they are cut to size for further processing into yarn and fabrics (Bojorges et al., 2023). [caption id="attachment_12414" align="aligncenter" width="418"] Figure 2. Schematic of the wet spinning process to produce fiber filaments and yarn. Source: Textile Learner (2022)[/caption]
Downstream Processing: Alginate leather
Sodium alginate powder is poured and set into a plasticizer (made of cardboard and/or faux leather) shaped to mimic a leather finish. Once the plaster is completely dried, a pigment-containing hydrogel is poured into the mold cavity and then compressed. Applying calcium chloride then nebulizes the hydrogel, curing the alginate without cracking the material; it also provides a protective patina to the exterior, which can give the material water and microbial resistance (Managò, 2022). [caption id="attachment_12416" align="aligncenter" width="540"] Figure 3. Heating sodium alginate for application to a mold cavity to set as alginate leather. Source: Managó (2022)[/caption]
Novel alginate extraction methods
More novel methods (e.g., ultrasound-, microwave, or enzyme-assisted extractions; MAE, UAE, EAE, respectively) are also being explored to extract sodium alginate for higher quality and efficiency (Saji et al., 2022; Bojorges et al., 2023). MAE, UAE, and EAE are desirable for industry-scale use due to their specificity in targeting desirable compounds, higher yields compared to traditional methods, and lower environmental impact compared to current commercial methods. Table 2 below summarizes the novel extraction methods and their current readiness.
Innovation What it is / How it works Claimed benefits
Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) Uses microwaves to break cell walls and release compounds in solvent or through vapor distillation Higher yields, less solvent Can use fresh seaweed
Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) High-frequency waves increase cell porosity, allowing solvent penetration Improved yields, scalable Does not impact heat-sensitive compounds Can use fresh seaweed
Enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE) Hydrolytic enzymes break cell walls, releasing cell contents to solvent Lower environmental impact
Table 2. Emerging extraction techniques for seaweed-based fiber production, claimed benefits, and technological readiness/status. Sources: Saji et al., (2022), Bojorges et al. (2023)

Cellulose

Cellulose fiber production occurs primarily through viscose, modal, and lyocell processes and with tree-based feedstock (e.g., eucalyptus, oak, birch; Varnaitė-Žuravliova and Baltušnikaitė-Guzaitienė, 2024). None of the current manufacturing methods incorporates raw seaweed as the dominant material in production. The lyocell process has been most commonly used in producing seaweed-based fibers given the lower environmental impacts of its production (Guo et al., 2021).
Lyocell Process
Dried and ground seaweed is suspended in an amine oxide (surfactants used as stabilizers, thickeners etc.) solution with wood pulp at constant heat. The seaweed suspension is then added to another wood pulp suspension in doses. Dosing occurs at the wood pulp treatment, subsequent cellulose suspension, and at the spinning and filtration stages. The mixture is then filtered, spun, washed, and dried, producing a fiber with approximately 4% seaweed for yarn and fabric manufacturing (Gregersen, 2019). If seaweed cellulose by-product is used following a prior product extraction process (e.g., after alginate extraction), it can be separated and characterized by whether its chemical composition (e.g., moisture, ash content, viscosity, dissolvability in lyocell solvents) enables further refinement into cellulose fibers (Figure 2B). If so, the by-product is processed using the lyocell method referenced above to purify the cellulose at levels suitable for fiber manufacture, sometimes in multiple rounds after chemical characterization. The diluted amine oxide can be recycled for future processing batches by purifying and evaporating the water. Research is ongoing to valorize seaweed residues from the hydrocolloid industry as a primary feedstock for cellulose; while the research is being developed for producing films, it could apply to fiber production for fabrics (Jiang et al., 2025). [caption id="attachment_12419" align="aligncenter" width="2560"] Figure 2. Flowcharts of how seaweed is added to alginate fiber processing (top) and cellulose fiber processing (bottom). Figure adapted from World Bank (2023) and Gregerson (2019)[/caption]

Species Selection, Cultivation and Harvesting

Species Selection

There are over 10,000 species of seaweed that vary substantially in their life cycles, impacting the concentration of compounds suitable for fiber production. Given the emerging exploration of seaweed-based fibers, seaweed species selected for production have been limited to regional seaweed supply. Species high in cellulose or alginate are desirable because the fibers produced are similar in chemical composition, mechanical performance, and tactile properties to conventional fibers (e.g., cellulose), or are already extracted in high volumes for other industries (e.g., alginates) (Felgueiras et al., 2021). Common products using seaweed-based cellulose have <10% inclusion, but with alginates it can increase to as much as 100%. Table 1 summarizes how seaweed-based fibers are commonly used and by what companies. Alginate & Cellulose AdditiveAlginate
Seaweed Species Fiber Production Type Use Cases Example Commercial Products (seaweed inclusion % if provided)
Saccharina latissima (Sugar Kelp) Alginate & Cellulose Yoga and loungewear prototypes TaraTekstil (aimed for >70% seaweed)
Durvillaea antarctica Alginate Home and fashion fabrics Biodegradable "sea leather" alternatives
Lithothamnium calcareum Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed)
Laminaria digitata Alginate Medical wound dressings Celluheal Chamfond biotech Algicell
Ascophyllum nodosum Alginate & Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments Shirts/undergarments Fashion collections SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed) Vitadylan™ (8–10% seaweed) Tabinotabi (uses SeaCell, ~4% seaweed)
Table 1. Examples of species used in fiber production, use cases, and associated companies/institutions with publicly available records of seaweed inclusion in the product.

Cultivation

For more information on the cultivation approaches, see the “Cultivation Considerations” chapter.

Harvesting

Currently the most common fibers made with seaweed (e.g., SeaCell) are sourced from wild harvests, which can produce variable quality. This is also seen in studies with cultivated seaweed species – for example, Ocean Rainforest has shown that the concentrations of alginates and cellulose can vary with seasonality (Gregersen, 2019). Processing information is proprietary in most cases, but general processing methods and active R&D are detailed below for alginate and cellulose-based fiber production (summarized in Figure 3).

Pre- and Processing

Alginate

Following preprocessing, seaweed is added to a tank with an alkaline solution (e.g., sodium carbonate). Consistent heating (e.g., 40°C for three hours) then converts the seaweed’s alginic acid to sodium alginate, the desired material. After conversion, the mixture is filtered to separate the solid fraction (containing materials like cellulose, fucoidan, laminarin) from the liquid fraction containing sodium alginate. Ethanol-induced precipitation purifies the sodium alginate for downstream processing (Gregersen, 2019; Managò, 2022; World Bank, 2023; Figure 2A).

Downstream Processing: Alginate fiber

Wet spinning mixes sodium alginate powder with water and soluble additives. The solution is passed through a spinneret or nozzle within a coagulation bath filled with a salt solution to link the polymer chains, producing fiber. Multiple rounds of washing, stretching, and drying occur to shape the fibers before they are cut to size for further processing into yarn and fabrics (Bojorges et al., 2023). [caption id="attachment_12414" align="aligncenter" width="418"] Figure 2. Schematic of the wet spinning process to produce fiber filaments and yarn. Source: Textile Learner (2022)[/caption]

Downstream Processing: Alginate leather

Sodium alginate powder is poured and set into a plasticizer (made of cardboard and/or faux leather) shaped to mimic a leather finish. Once the plaster is completely dried, a pigment-containing hydrogel is poured into the mold cavity and then compressed. Applying calcium chloride then nebulizes the hydrogel, curing the alginate without cracking the material; it also provides a protective patina to the exterior, which can give the material water and microbial resistance (Managò, 2022). [caption id="attachment_12416" align="aligncenter" width="540"] Figure 3. Heating sodium alginate for application to a mold cavity to set as alginate leather. Source: Managó (2022)[/caption]

Novel alginate extraction methods

More novel methods (e.g., ultrasound-, microwave, or enzyme-assisted extractions; MAE, UAE, EAE, respectively) are also being explored to extract sodium alginate for higher quality and efficiency (Saji et al., 2022; Bojorges et al., 2023). MAE, UAE, and EAE are desirable for industry-scale use due to their specificity in targeting desirable compounds, higher yields compared to traditional methods, and lower environmental impact compared to current commercial methods. Table 2 below summarizes the novel extraction methods and their current readiness.
Innovation What it is / How it works Claimed benefits
Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) Uses microwaves to break cell walls and release compounds in solvent or through vapor distillation Higher yields, less solvent Can use fresh seaweed
Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) High-frequency waves increase cell porosity, allowing solvent penetration Improved yields, scalable Does not impact heat-sensitive compounds Can use fresh seaweed
Enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE) Hydrolytic enzymes break cell walls, releasing cell contents to solvent Lower environmental impact
Table 2. Emerging extraction techniques for seaweed-based fiber production, claimed benefits, and technological readiness/status. Sources: Saji et al., (2022), Bojorges et al. (2023)

Cellulose

Cellulose fiber production occurs primarily through viscose, modal, and lyocell processes and with tree-based feedstock (e.g., eucalyptus, oak, birch; Varnaitė-Žuravliova and Baltušnikaitė-Guzaitienė, 2024). None of the current manufacturing methods incorporates raw seaweed as the dominant material in production. The lyocell process has been most commonly used in producing seaweed-based fibers given the lower environmental impacts of its production (Guo et al., 2021).

Lyocell Process

Dried and ground seaweed is suspended in an amine oxide (surfactants used as stabilizers, thickeners etc.) solution with wood pulp at constant heat. The seaweed suspension is then added to another wood pulp suspension in doses. Dosing occurs at the wood pulp treatment, subsequent cellulose suspension, and at the spinning and filtration stages. The mixture is then filtered, spun, washed, and dried, producing a fiber with approximately 4% seaweed for yarn and fabric manufacturing (Gregersen, 2019). If seaweed cellulose by-product is used following a prior product extraction process (e.g., after alginate extraction), it can be separated and characterized by whether its chemical composition (e.g., moisture, ash content, viscosity, dissolvability in lyocell solvents) enables further refinement into cellulose fibers (Figure 2B). If so, the by-product is processed using the lyocell method referenced above to purify the cellulose at levels suitable for fiber manufacture, sometimes in multiple rounds after chemical characterization. The diluted amine oxide can be recycled for future processing batches by purifying and evaporating the water. Research is ongoing to valorize seaweed residues from the hydrocolloid industry as a primary feedstock for cellulose; while the research is being developed for producing films, it could apply to fiber production for fabrics (Jiang et al., 2025). [caption id="attachment_12419" align="aligncenter" width="2560"] Figure 2. Flowcharts of how seaweed is added to alginate fiber processing (top) and cellulose fiber processing (bottom). Figure adapted from World Bank (2023) and Gregerson (2019)[/caption]

Species Selection, Cultivation and Harvesting

Species Selection

There are over 10,000 species of seaweed that vary substantially in their life cycles, impacting the concentration of compounds suitable for fiber production. Given the emerging exploration of seaweed-based fibers, seaweed species selected for production have been limited to regional seaweed supply. Species high in cellulose or alginate are desirable because the fibers produced are similar in chemical composition, mechanical performance, and tactile properties to conventional fibers (e.g., cellulose), or are already extracted in high volumes for other industries (e.g., alginates) (Felgueiras et al., 2021). Common products using seaweed-based cellulose have <10% inclusion, but with alginates it can increase to as much as 100%. Table 1 summarizes how seaweed-based fibers are commonly used and by what companies. Alginate & Cellulose AdditiveAlginate
Seaweed Species Fiber Production Type Use Cases Example Commercial Products (seaweed inclusion % if provided)
Saccharina latissima (Sugar Kelp) Alginate & Cellulose Yoga and loungewear prototypes TaraTekstil (aimed for >70% seaweed)
Durvillaea antarctica Alginate Home and fashion fabrics Biodegradable "sea leather" alternatives
Lithothamnium calcareum Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed)
Laminaria digitata Alginate Medical wound dressings Celluheal Chamfond biotech Algicell
Ascophyllum nodosum Alginate & Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments Shirts/undergarments Fashion collections SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed) Vitadylan™ (8–10% seaweed) Tabinotabi (uses SeaCell, ~4% seaweed)
Table 1. Examples of species used in fiber production, use cases, and associated companies/institutions with publicly available records of seaweed inclusion in the product.

Cultivation

For more information on the cultivation approaches, see the “Cultivation Considerations” chapter.

Harvesting

Currently the most common fibers made with seaweed (e.g., SeaCell) are sourced from wild harvests, which can produce variable quality. This is also seen in studies with cultivated seaweed species – for example, Ocean Rainforest has shown that the concentrations of alginates and cellulose can vary with seasonality (Gregersen, 2019).

Species Selection, Cultivation and Harvesting

Species Selection

There are over 10,000 species of seaweed that vary substantially in their life cycles, impacting the concentration of compounds suitable for fiber production. Given the emerging exploration of seaweed-based fibers, seaweed species selected for production have been limited to regional seaweed supply. Species high in cellulose or alginate are desirable because the fibers produced are similar in chemical composition, mechanical performance, and tactile properties to conventional fibers (e.g., cellulose), or are already extracted in high volumes for other industries (e.g., alginates) (Felgueiras et al., 2021). Common products using seaweed-based cellulose have <10% inclusion, but with alginates it can increase to as much as 100%. Table 1 summarizes how seaweed-based fibers are commonly used and by what companies. Alginate & Cellulose AdditiveAlginate
Seaweed Species Fiber Production Type Use Cases Example Commercial Products (seaweed inclusion % if provided)
Saccharina latissima (Sugar Kelp) Alginate & Cellulose Yoga and loungewear prototypes TaraTekstil (aimed for >70% seaweed)
Durvillaea antarctica Alginate Home and fashion fabrics Biodegradable "sea leather" alternatives
Lithothamnium calcareum Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed)
Laminaria digitata Alginate Medical wound dressings Celluheal Chamfond biotech Algicell
Ascophyllum nodosum Alginate & Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments Shirts/undergarments Fashion collections SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed) Vitadylan™ (8–10% seaweed) Tabinotabi (uses SeaCell, ~4% seaweed)
Table 1. Examples of species used in fiber production, use cases, and associated companies/institutions with publicly available records of seaweed inclusion in the product.

Cultivation

For more information on the cultivation approaches, see the “Cultivation Considerations” chapter.

Harvesting

Currently the most common fibers made with seaweed (e.g., SeaCell) are sourced from wild harvests, which can produce variable quality. This is also seen in studies with cultivated seaweed species – for example, Ocean Rainforest has shown that the concentrations of alginates and cellulose can vary with seasonality (Gregersen, 2019).

Species Selection

There are over 10,000 species of seaweed that vary substantially in their life cycles, impacting the concentration of compounds suitable for fiber production. Given the emerging exploration of seaweed-based fibers, seaweed species selected for production have been limited to regional seaweed supply. Species high in cellulose or alginate are desirable because the fibers produced are similar in chemical composition, mechanical performance, and tactile properties to conventional fibers (e.g., cellulose), or are already extracted in high volumes for other industries (e.g., alginates) (Felgueiras et al., 2021). Common products using seaweed-based cellulose have <10% inclusion, but with alginates it can increase to as much as 100%. Table 1 summarizes how seaweed-based fibers are commonly used and by what companies. Alginate & Cellulose AdditiveAlginate
Seaweed Species Fiber Production Type Use Cases Example Commercial Products (seaweed inclusion % if provided)
Saccharina latissima (Sugar Kelp) Alginate & Cellulose Yoga and loungewear prototypes TaraTekstil (aimed for >70% seaweed)
Durvillaea antarctica Alginate Home and fashion fabrics Biodegradable "sea leather" alternatives
Lithothamnium calcareum Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed)
Laminaria digitata Alginate Medical wound dressings Celluheal Chamfond biotech Algicell
Ascophyllum nodosum Alginate & Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments Shirts/undergarments Fashion collections SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed) Vitadylan™ (8–10% seaweed) Tabinotabi (uses SeaCell, ~4% seaweed)
Table 1. Examples of species used in fiber production, use cases, and associated companies/institutions with publicly available records of seaweed inclusion in the product.

Cultivation

For more information on the cultivation approaches, see the “Cultivation Considerations” chapter.

Harvesting

Currently the most common fibers made with seaweed (e.g., SeaCell) are sourced from wild harvests, which can produce variable quality. This is also seen in studies with cultivated seaweed species – for example, Ocean Rainforest has shown that the concentrations of alginates and cellulose can vary with seasonality (Gregersen, 2019).

Species Selection

There are over 10,000 species of seaweed that vary substantially in their life cycles, impacting the concentration of compounds suitable for fiber production. Given the emerging exploration of seaweed-based fibers, seaweed species selected for production have been limited to regional seaweed supply. Species high in cellulose or alginate are desirable because the fibers produced are similar in chemical composition, mechanical performance, and tactile properties to conventional fibers (e.g., cellulose), or are already extracted in high volumes for other industries (e.g., alginates) (Felgueiras et al., 2021). Common products using seaweed-based cellulose have <10% inclusion, but with alginates it can increase to as much as 100%. Table 1 summarizes how seaweed-based fibers are commonly used and by what companies. Alginate & Cellulose AdditiveAlginate
Seaweed Species Fiber Production Type Use Cases Example Commercial Products (seaweed inclusion) Use Cases
Saccharina latissima (Sugar Kelp) Alginate & Cellulose Yoga and loungewear prototypes TaraTekstil (aimed for >70% seaweed)
Durvillaea antarctica Alginate   Biodegradable "sea leather" alternatives (inclusion not provided)
Lithothamnium calcareum Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed)
Laminaria digitata Alginate Medical wound dressings Celluheal (inclusion not provided) Chamfond biotech (inclusion not provided) Algicell (inclusion not provided)
Ascophyllum nodosum Alginate & Cellulose Additive Active wellness garments Shirts/undergarments Fashion collections SeaCell™ (~4% seaweed) Vitadylan™ (8–10% seaweed) Tabinotabi (uses SeaCell, ~4% seaweed)
Table 1. Examples of species used in fiber production, use cases, and associated companies/institutions with publicly available records of seaweed inclusion in the product.

Cultivation

For more information on the cultivation approaches, see the “Cultivation Considerations” chapter.

Harvesting

Currently the most common fibers made with seaweed (e.g., SeaCell) are sourced from wild harvests, which can produce variable quality. This is also seen in studies with cultivated seaweed species – for example, Ocean Rainforest has shown that the concentrations of alginates and cellulose can vary with seasonality (Gregersen, 2019).
In 2023, the apparel sector generated 944 million tons of global greenhouse gas emissions, almost 2% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). Consumer desire is increasing for sustainable fashion that reduces waste and uses low-carbon alternatives to conventional fibers such as cotton and polyester. Seaweed-based fabrics could be part of the solution. In addition to potentially reducing emissions if substituting for conventional fabrics, they can also potentially reduce pressures on the use of  water and arable land. Seaweed-based alginate and cellulose fibers have desirable properties for fabrics, are currently used in medical applications such as wound dressings and are gaining attention in garment and furniture fabrics, hygiene products, and more. This chapter covers the state of science, policies, and markets underpinning seaweed-based fiber production for use in fabrics, covering process steps after seaweed biomass is harvest and before the fiber is woven into a fabric. For seaweed cultivation and dewatering/drying, refer to the “Cultivation and Dewatering/Drying” chapter. Figure 1 summarizes the lifecycle elements discussed below. Cleaned, dewatered, and dried seaweed is milled into a fine powder to increase surface area, then soaked to break down cell walls and remove compounds like fats and proteins that can weaken fiber quality. The pre-treated material is then refined into either alginate or cellulose intermediates: sodium alginate is extracted and formed into a spinnable solution, while cellulose is isolated and regenerated into filaments. Alginate routes typically spin the alginate into filaments (or mold it into sheets for bio-leather). Cellulose routes wet-spin regenerated cellulose into fibers similar to plant-derived cellulose, which are the most common fibers used for “seaweed fabrics” in medical, home, and fashion contexts.

Pre-processing

After being cleaned, dewatered, and dried, fresh seaweed is milled into a fine powder to increase surface area for subsequent soaking treatments. This can range from simple integration into existing soaks (e.g., cellulose) to complex acid or alkaline chemical baths (e.g., alginate). The goal is to dissolve cell walls and remove compounds that can degrade fiber quality (e.g., fats, proteins; Saji et al., 2022).

Processing

The processing stage is where pre-treated seaweed powder is refined to generate desired alginate/cellulose filaments or gels which are then spun into fibers or molded into sheets, respectively.

Alginate fibers/gels

Alginate fibers are created by spinning extracted sodium alginate into filaments; sodium alginate can also be molded into sheets to make bio-leather. Alginate fibers are very good at soaking up liquid and turning into a soft gel, which makes them well-suited for medical bandages. However, this quality limits their use in everyday clothes and water-resistant use-cases (Qin, 2008; World Bank, 2023).

Cellulose fibers

Seaweed-based cellulose fibers are made by isolating glucose-based cellulose and regenerating it into filaments, then wet-spinning into fibers. The fibers are similar to those found in terrestrial plants, and are used to produce the “seaweed fabrics” seen today (Gregersen, 2019; Baghel et al., 2021).

Post-processing

Seaweed-based fibers are then blended with other fibers for further manufacturing into fabrics for different use-cases (e.g., medical, home, fashion; see Figure 1) and scale (e.g., personal use, fashion brand, commercial-scale). [caption id="attachment_12409" align="aligncenter" width="1430"] Figure 1. FTC x SeaCell collaboration fashion campaign, using SEACELL Cashmere. Source: SMARTFIBER AG | SEACELL[/caption]

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Technology Readiness Level

Table 3 below summarizes the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of fibers with seaweed inclusion. Companies that incorporate seaweed as a minor additive into fiber blends are generally commercialized but niche (TRL 7–9), while those that seek to make seaweed the dominant feedstock are in the emerging research levels (TRL 2-4; Gregersen, 2019; World Bank, 2023).

Product type Manufacturing process Commercial examples TRL % inclusion Trade-offs
Cellulosic fiber with seaweed additive Seaweed extract blended with wood pulp or cotton before standard viscose / Lyocell spinning SeaCell

Vitadylan

7–9 Up to 10% Technically feasible and commercially proven
Established supply chain
Low seaweed content limits ecological co-benefits
Fiber blend using seaweed-based fiber Seaweed-derived fiber blended with plant-based fiber prior to yarn production Pangaia: C-Fiber

Terratela: SeaFibe

PYRATEX x Seacell

Ecosphere

FTC Cashmere

Supercarb

5–7 0.05–0.1% Blend approach reduces manufacturing risk
Small commercial availability
Very low seaweed content raises questions about meaningful ecological or health co-benefits
Alginate fiber or leather Conversion to sodium alginate, followed by liquid fraction separation and subsequent wet-spinning (fiber) or molding (leather) Smith and Nephew

AQUACEL

Mölnlycke Health Care

Kelsun – Keel Labs

MOICvegan

Uncommon Alchemy

4–6 Partial inclusion Prototyping with limited commercial availability
Medical-grade wound-care products established
Fashion/apparel applications remain pre-commercial
Scale-up expected within ~10–12 years
Seaweed as main component To be determined — multiple experimental processing routes under active R&D Keel Labs (formerly AlgiKnit)

AlgaLife

2–4 Close to 100% Significant R&D still required
Substantial seaweed feedstock volumes needed at scale
Potential human health co-benefits claimed but not yet confirmed through clinical trials
Highest ecological co-benefit potential if proven

Table 3. Fiber product, process, commercial examples, TRL, percentage of seaweed inclusion and tradeoffs. Sources: Gregersen (2019), World Bank Report (2023)

Table 3 below summarizes the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of fibers with seaweed inclusion. Companies that incorporate seaweed as a minor additive into fiber blends are generally commercialized but niche (TRL 7–9), while those that seek to make seaweed the dominant feedstock are in the emerging research levels (TRL 2-4; Gregersen, 2019; World Bank, 2023).
Product type Manufacturing process Commercial examples TRL % inclusion Trade-offs
Cellulosic fiber with seaweed additive Seaweed extract blended with wood pulp or cotton before standard viscose / Lyocell spinning SeaCell Vitadylan 7–9 Up to 10% Technically feasible and commercially proven Established supply chain Low seaweed content limits ecological co-benefits
Fiber blend using seaweed-based fiber Seaweed-derived fiber blended with plant-based fiber prior to yarn production Pangaia: C-Fiber Terratela: SeaFibe PYRATEX x Seacell Ecosphere FTC Cashmere Supercarb 5–7 0.05–0.1% Blend approach reduces manufacturing risk Small commercial availability Very low seaweed content raises questions about meaningful ecological or health co-benefits
Alginate fiber or leather Conversion to sodium alginate, followed by liquid fraction separation and subsequent wet-spinning (fiber) or molding (leather) Smith and Nephew AQUACEL Mölnlycke Health Care Kelsun – Keel Labs MOICvegan Uncommon Alchemy 4–6 Partial inclusion Prototyping with limited commercial availability Medical-grade wound-care products established Fashion/apparel applications remain pre-commercial Scale-up expected within ~10–12 years
Seaweed as main component To be determined — multiple experimental processing routes under active R&D Keel Labs (formerly AlgiKnit) AlgaLife 2–4 Close to 100% Significant R&D still required Substantial seaweed feedstock volumes needed at scale Potential human health co-benefits claimed but not yet confirmed through clinical trials Highest ecological co-benefit potential if proven
Table 3. Fiber product, process, commercial examples, TRL, percentage of seaweed inclusion and tradeoffs. Sources: Gregersen (2019), World Bank Report (2023)
Table 3 below summarizes the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of fibers with seaweed inclusion. Companies that incorporate seaweed as a minor additive into fiber blends are generally commercialized but niche (TRL 7–9), while those that seek to make seaweed the dominant feedstock are in the emerging research levels (TRL 2-4; Gregersen, 2019; World Bank, 2023).  
Product type Manufacturing process Commercial examples TRL % inclusion Trade-offs
Cellulosic fiber with seaweed additive Seaweed extract blended with wood pulp or cotton before standard viscose / Lyocell spinning SeaCell Vitadylan 7–9 Up to 10% Technically feasible and commercially proven Established supply chain Low seaweed content limits ecological co-benefits
Fiber blend using seaweed-based fiber Seaweed-derived fiber blended with plant-based fiber prior to yarn production Pangaia: C-Fiber Terratela: SeaFibe PYRATEX x Seacell Ecosphere FTC Cashmere Supercarb 5–7 0.05–0.1% Blend approach reduces manufacturing risk Small commercial availability Very low seaweed content raises questions about meaningful ecological or health co-benefits
Alginate fiber or leather Conversion to sodium alginate, followed by liquid fraction separation and subsequent wet-spinning (fiber) or molding (leather) Smith and Nephew AQUACEL Mölnlycke Health Care Kelsun – Keel Labs MOICvegan Uncommon Alchemy 4–6 Partial inclusion Prototyping with limited commercial availability Medical-grade wound-care products established Fashion/apparel applications remain pre-commercial Scale-up expected within ~10–12 years
Seaweed as main component To be determined — multiple experimental processing routes under active R&D Keel Labs (formerly AlgiKnit) AlgaLife 2–4 Close to 100% Significant R&D still required Substantial seaweed feedstock volumes needed at scale Potential human health co-benefits claimed but not yet confirmed through clinical trials Highest ecological co-benefit potential if proven
Table 3. Fiber product, process, commercial examples, TRL, percentage of seaweed inclusion and tradeoffs. Sources: Gregersen (2019), World Bank Report (2023)
Table 3 below summarizes the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of fibers with seaweed inclusion. Companies that incorporate seaweed as a minor additive into fiber blends are generally commercialized but niche (TRL 7–9), while those that seek to make seaweed the dominant feedstock are in the emerging research levels (TRL 2-4; Gregersen, 2019; World Bank, 2023).  
Product type Manufacturing process Commercial examples TRL % inclusion Trade-offs
Cellulosic fiber with seaweed additive Seaweed extract blended with wood pulp or cotton before standard viscose / Lyocell spinning SeaCell Vitadylan 7–9 Up to 10% Technically feasible and commercially proven Established supply chain Low seaweed content limits ecological co-benefits
Fiber blend using seaweed-based fiber Seaweed-derived fiber blended with plant-based fiber prior to yarn production Pangaia: C-Fiber Terratela: SeaFibe PYRATEX x Seacell Ecosphere FTC Cashmere Supercarb 5–7 0.05–0.1% Blend approach reduces manufacturing risk Small commercial availability Very low seaweed content raises questions about meaningful ecological or health co-benefits
Alginate fiber or leather Conversion to sodium alginate, followed by liquid fraction separation and subsequent wet-spinning (fiber) or molding (leather) Smith and Nephew AQUACEL Mölnlycke Health Care Kelsun – Keel Labs MOICvegan Uncommon Alchemy 4–6 Partial inclusion Prototyping with limited commercial availability Medical-grade wound-care products established Fashion/apparel applications remain pre-commercial Scale-up expected within ~10–12 years
Seaweed as main component To be determined — multiple experimental processing routes under active R&D Keel Labs (formerly AlgiKnit) AlgaLife 2–4 Close to 100% Significant R&D still required Substantial seaweed feedstock volumes needed at scale Potential human health co-benefits claimed but not yet confirmed through clinical trials Highest ecological co-benefit potential if proven
Table 3. Fiber product, process, commercial examples, TRL, percentage of seaweed inclusion and tradeoffs. Sources: Gregersen (2019), World Bank Report (2023)
Table 3 below summarizes the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of fibers with seaweed inclusion. Companies that incorporate seaweed as a minor additive into fiber blends are generally commercialized but niche (TRL 7–9), while those that seek to make seaweed the dominant feedstock are in the emerging research levels (TRL 2-4; Gregersen, 2019; World Bank, 2023).  
Product type Manufacturing process Commercial examples TRL Seaweed in final product Trade-offs
Cellulosic fiber with seaweed additive Seaweed extract blended with wood pulp or cotton before standard viscose / Lyocell spinning SeaCell Vitadylan 7–9 Up to 10% Technically feasible and commercially proven Established supply chain Low seaweed content limits ecological co-benefits
Fiber blend using seaweed-based fiber Seaweed-derived fiber blended with plant-based fiber prior to yarn production Pangaia: C-Fiber Terratela: SeaFibe PYRATEX x Seacell Ecosphere FTC Cashmere Supercarb 5–7 0.05–0.1% Blend approach reduces manufacturing risk Small commercial availability Very low seaweed content raises questions about meaningful ecological or health co-benefits
Alginate fiber or leather Conversion to sodium alginate, followed by liquid fraction separation and subsequent wet-spinning (fiber) or molding (leather) Smith and Nephew AQUACEL Mölnlycke Health Care Kelsun – Keel Labs MOICvegan Uncommon Alchemy 4–6 Partial inclusion Prototyping with limited commercial availability Medical-grade wound-care products established Fashion/apparel applications remain pre-commercial Scale-up expected within ~10–12 years
Seaweed as main component To be determined — multiple experimental processing routes under active R&D Keel Labs (formerly AlgiKnit) AlgaLife 2–4 Close to 100% Significant R&D still required Substantial seaweed feedstock volumes needed at scale Potential human health co-benefits claimed but not yet confirmed through clinical trials Highest ecological co-benefit potential if proven
Table 3. Fiber product, process, commercial examples, TRL, percentage of seaweed inclusion and tradeoffs. Sources: Gregersen (2019), World Bank Report (2023)
Table 3 below summarizes the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of fibers with seaweed inclusion. Companies that incorporate seaweed as a minor additive into fiber blends are generally commercialized but niche (TRL 7–9), while those that seek to make seaweed the dominant feedstock are in the emerging research levels (TRL 2-4; Gregersen, 2019; World Bank, 2023).  
Product type Manufacturing process Commercial examples TRL Seaweed in final product Trade-offs
Cellulosic fiber with seaweed additive Lyocell; SeaCell; Vitadylan Seaweed extract blended with wood pulp or cotton before standard viscose / Lyocell spinning SeaCell Vitadylan 7–9 Up to 10% Technically feasible and commercially proven. Low seaweed content limits ecological co-benefits. Supply chain well established.
Alginate fiber or leather Conversion to sodium alginate → liquid fraction separation → wet-spinning (fiber) or molding (leather) Smith and Nephew AQUACEL Mölnlycke Health Care Kelsun – Keel Labs MOICvegan Uncommon Alchemy 4–6 Partial inclusion Prototyping with limited commercial availability. Medical-grade wound-care products established; apparel applications remain pre-commercial. Scale-up expected within approx. 10–12 years.
Fiber blend using seaweed-based fiber Seaweed-derived fiber (e.g., SeaCell) blended with plant-based fiber prior to yarn spinning Pangaia: C-Fiber Terratela: SeaFibe PYRATEX x Seacell Ecosphere FTC Cashmere Supercarb 5–7 0.05–0.1% Small commercial availability. Very low seaweed content raises questions about meaningful ecological or health co-benefits. Blend approach reduces manufacturing risk.
Seaweed as main component To be determined — multiple experimental processing routes under active R&D Keel Labs (formerly AlgiKnit) AlgaLife 2–4 Close to 100% Significant R&D still required. Substantial seaweed feedstock volumes needed at scale. Potential human health co-benefits claimed but not yet confirmed through clinical trials. Highest ecological co-benefit potential if proven.
Table 3. Fiber product, process, commercial examples, TRL, percentage of seaweed inclusion and tradeoffs. Sources: Gregersen (2019), World Bank Report (2023)
Companies that incorporate seaweed as a minor additive into fiber blends are generally commercialized but niche (TRL 7–9), while those that seek to make seaweed the dominant feedstock are in the emerging research levels (TRL 2-4; Gregersen, 2019; World Bank, 2023). Table 3 below summarizes the TRL of fibers with seaweed inclusion.  
Product type Manufacturing process Commercial examples TRL Seaweed in final product Trade-offs
Cellulosic fiber with seaweed additive Lyocell; SeaCell; Vitadylan Seaweed extract blended with wood pulp or cotton before standard viscose / Lyocell spinning SeaCell Vitadylan 7–9 Up to 10% Technically feasible and commercially proven. Low seaweed content limits ecological co-benefits. Supply chain well established.
Alginate fiber or leather Conversion to sodium alginate → liquid fraction separation → wet-spinning (fiber) or molding (leather) Smith and Nephew AQUACEL Mölnlycke Health Care Kelsun – Keel Labs MOICvegan Uncommon Alchemy 4–6 Partial inclusion Prototyping with limited commercial availability. Medical-grade wound-care products established; apparel applications remain pre-commercial. Scale-up expected within approx. 10–12 years.
Fiber blend using seaweed-based fiber Seaweed-derived fiber (e.g., SeaCell) blended with plant-based fiber prior to yarn spinning Pangaia: C-Fiber Terratela: SeaFibe PYRATEX x Seacell Ecosphere FTC Cashmere Supercarb 5–7 0.05–0.1% Small commercial availability. Very low seaweed content raises questions about meaningful ecological or health co-benefits. Blend approach reduces manufacturing risk.
Seaweed as main component To be determined — multiple experimental processing routes under active R&D Keel Labs (formerly AlgiKnit) AlgaLife 2–4 Close to 100% Significant R&D still required. Substantial seaweed feedstock volumes needed at scale. Potential human health co-benefits claimed but not yet confirmed through clinical trials. Highest ecological co-benefit potential if proven.
Table 3. Fiber product, process, commercial examples, TRL, percentage of seaweed inclusion and tradeoffs. Sources: Gregersen (2019), World Bank Report (2023)
Companies that incorporate seaweed as a minor additive into fiber blends are generally commercialized but niche (TRL 7–9), while those that seek to make seaweed the dominant feedstock are in the emerging research levels (TRL 2-4; Gregersen, 2019; World Bank, 2023). Table 3 below summarizes the TRL of fibers with seaweed inclusion.  
Product type Manufacturing process Commercial examples TRL Seaweed in final product Trade-offs
Cellulosic fiber with seaweed additive Lyocell; SeaCell; Vitadylan Seaweed extract blended with wood pulp or cotton before standard viscose / Lyocell spinning SeaCell Vitadylan 7–9 Up to 10% Technically feasible and commercially proven. Low seaweed content limits ecological co-benefits. Supply chain well established.
Alginate fiber or leather Conversion to sodium alginate → liquid fraction separation → wet-spinning (fiber) or molding (leather) Smith and Nephew AQUACEL Mölnlycke Health Care Kelsun – Keel Labs MOICvegan Uncommon Alchemy 4–6 Partial inclusion Prototyping with limited commercial availability. Medical-grade wound-care products established; apparel applications remain pre-commercial. Scale-up expected within approx. 10–12 years.
Fiber blend using seaweed-based fiber Seaweed-derived fiber (e.g., SeaCell) blended with plant-based fiber prior to yarn spinning Pangaia: C-Fiber Terratela: SeaFibe PYRATEX x Seacell Ecosphere FTC Cashmere Supercarb 5–7 0.05–0.1% Small commercial availability. Very low seaweed content raises questions about meaningful ecological or health co-benefits. Blend approach reduces manufacturing risk.
Seaweed as main component To be determined — multiple experimental processing routes under active R&D Keel Labs (formerly AlgiKnit) AlgaLife 2–4 Close to 100% Significant R&D still required. Substantial seaweed feedstock volumes needed at scale. Potential human health co-benefits claimed but not yet confirmed through clinical trials. Highest ecological co-benefit potential if proven.
Table 3. Fiber product, process, commercial examples, TRL, percentage of seaweed inclusion and tradeoffs. Sources: Gregersen (2019), World Bank Report (2023)

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Product Performance

Buyers interested in seaweed-based fibers compare them to the durability, water resistance, tensile strength, and feel found in conventional petroleum- and cotton-based products. Currently, seaweed-based fibers have limited inclusion in garments and furniture due to concerns over material integrity (Gregersen, 2019; SEACELL, 2025; World Bank, 2023). For example, laundry is one of the most energy-intensive processes in a garment’s life, a challenge for alginate-based fibers  with high absorbency (World Bank, 2023). In certain cases, seaweed-based fibers’ have a performance advantage; for example, seaweed-based dressings specialized for wounds that need moist environments (e.g., burns, ulcers, sores), or hygiene products like Vyld’s tampon (“kelpon”), to absorb blood and other bodily fluids.

Buyers interested in seaweed-based fibers compare them to the durability, water resistance, tensile strength, and feel found in conventional petroleum- and cotton-based products. Currently, seaweed-based fibers have limited inclusion in garments and furniture due to concerns over material integrity (Gregersen, 2019; SEACELL, 2025; World Bank, 2023). For example, laundry is one of the most energy-intensive processes in a garment’s life, a challenge for alginate-based fibers  with high absorbency (World Bank, 2023). In certain cases, seaweed-based fibers’ have a performance advantage; for example, seaweed-based dressings specialized for wounds that need moist environments (e.g., burns, ulcers, sores), or hygiene products like Vyld's tampon (“kelpon”), to absorb blood and other bodily fluids.
State of the Market USD value in billions (2024) USD value in billions (2030) Growth rate 2025–2030 (%)
Global fiber market 48.7 63.4 4.5
Polyester fiber 20.4 26.6 4.5*
Natural fibers 9.7 12.5 4.3
Seaweed-based fibers
Global biosynthetic textile market 20.8 36.8 10
Potential seaweed-based synthetic textile market - 0.86 -
Table 3. State of the Market of global fibers, grouped into polyester and natural fibers; and biosynthetic textiles. The market of seaweed-based fibers is currently too small to be quantified. *Growth rate used is from global fiber market. Sources: Grand View Research (2026), Textile Exchange (2024) World Bank (2023)

Costs and market adoption

Fashion and clothing segment makes up 52.8% of the textile fiber market in 2024, and consumer habits/preferences are shifting in favor of greener, sustainable products that promote circular economies and zero waste (Todeschini et al., 2017; Grand View Research, 2026). Notable examples have already been seen by fast fashion giants like C&A’s 2014 program and H&M’s commitment to manufacture goods from 100% circular and sustainably sourced materials by 2030 (H&M, 2025). Seaweed-based fibers can speak to the circular economy and zero waste desires of consumers, but only if its durability, design, and price is competitive with conventional materials. Current small-scale production is not economically viable, and more techno-economic studies are needed to evaluate costs at scale.

Product Performance

Buyers interested in seaweed-based fibers compare them to the durability, water resistance, tensile strength, and feel found in conventional petroleum- and cotton-based products. Currently, seaweed-based fibers have limited inclusion in garments and furniture due to concerns over material integrity (Gregersen, 2019; SEACELL, 2025; World Bank, 2023). For example, laundry is one of the most energy-intensive processes in a garment’s life, a challenge for alginate-based fibers  with high absorbency (World Bank, 2023). In certain cases, seaweed-based fibers’ have a performance advantage; for example, seaweed-based dressings specialized for wounds that need moist environments (e.g., burns, ulcers, sores), or hygiene products like Vyld's tampon (“kelpon”), to absorb blood and other bodily fluids.
State of the Market USD value in billions (2024) USD value in billions (2030) Growth rate 2025–2030 (%)
Global fiber market 48.7 63.4 4.5
Polyester fiber 20.4 26.6 4.5*
Natural fibers 9.7 12.5 4.3
Seaweed-based fibers
Global biosynthetic textile market 20.8 36.8 10
Potential seaweed-based synthetic textile market - 0.86 -
Table 3. State of the Market of global fibers, grouped into polyester and natural fibers. The market of seaweed-based fibers is too small to be quantified. *Growth rate used from global fiber market Sources: Grand View Research (2026), Textile Exchange (2024) World Bank (2023)

Costs and market adoption

Fashion and clothing segment makes up 52.8% of the textile fiber market in 2024, and consumer habits/preferences are shifting in favor of greener, sustainable products that promote circular economies and zero waste (Todeschini et al., 2017; Grand View Research, 2026). Notable examples have already been seen by fast fashion giants like C&A’s 2014 program and H&M’s commitment to manufacture goods from 100% circular and sustainably sourced materials by 2030 (H&M, 2025). Seaweed-based fibers can speak to the circular economy and zero waste desires of consumers, but only if its durability, design, and price is competitive with conventional materials. Current small-scale production is not economically viable, and more techno-economic studies are needed to evaluate costs at scale.

Product Performance

Buyers interested in seaweed-based fibers compare them to the durability, water resistance, tensile strength, and feel found in conventional petroleum- and cotton-based products. Currently, seaweed-based fibers have limited inclusion in garments and furniture due to concerns over material integrity (Gregersen, 2019; SEACELL, 2025; World Bank, 2023). For example, laundry is one of the most energy-intensive processes in a garment’s life, a challenge for alginate-based fibers  with high absorbency (World Bank, 2023). In certain cases, seaweed-based fibers’ have a performance advantage; for example, seaweed-based dressings specialized for wounds that need moist environments (e.g., burns, ulcers, sores), or hygiene products like Vyld's tampon (“kelpon”), to absorb blood and other bodily fluids.
State of the Market USD value in billions (2024) USD value in billions (2030) Growth rate 2025–2030 (%)
Global fiber market 48.7 63.4 4.5
Polyester fiber 20.4 26.6 4.5*
Natural fibers 9.7 12.5 4.3
Seaweed-based fibers
Global biosynthetic textile market 20.8 36.8 10
Potential seaweed-based synthetic textile market - 0.86 -
Table 3. State of the Market of global fibers, grouped into polyester and natural fibers. The market of seaweed-based fibers is too small to be quantified. *Growth rate used from global fiber market Sources: Grand View Research (2026), Textile Exchange (2024) World Bank (2023)

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Cost/Market Adoption

Version published: 
State of the Market USD value in billions (2024) USD value in billions (2030) Growth rate 2025–2030 (%)
Global fiber market 48.7 63.4 4.5
Polyester fiber 20.4 26.6 4.5*
Natural fibers 9.7 12.5 4.3
Seaweed-based fibers
Global biosynthetic textile market 20.8 36.8 10
Potential seaweed-based synthetic textile market 0.86

Table 3. State of the Market of global fibers, grouped into polyester and natural fibers; and biosynthetic textiles. The market of seaweed-based fibers is currently too small to be quantified. *Growth rate used is from global fiber market. Sources: Grand View Research (2026), Textile Exchange (2024) World Bank (2023)

Fashion and clothing segment makes up 52.8% of the textile fiber market in 2024, and consumer habits/preferences are shifting in favor of greener, sustainable products that promote circular economies and zero waste (Todeschini et al., 2017; Grand View Research, 2026). Notable examples have already been seen by fast fashion giants like C&A’s 2014 program and H&M’s commitment to manufacture goods from 100% circular and sustainably sourced materials by 2030 (H&M, 2025). Seaweed-based fibers can speak to the circular economy and zero waste desires of consumers, but only if its durability, design, and price is competitive with conventional materials. Current small-scale production is not economically viable, and more techno-economic studies are needed to evaluate costs at scale.

State of the Market USD value in billions (2024) USD value in billions (2030) Growth rate 2025–2030 (%)
Global fiber market 48.7 63.4 4.5
Polyester fiber 20.4 26.6 4.5*
Natural fibers 9.7 12.5 4.3
Seaweed-based fibers
Global biosynthetic textile market 20.8 36.8 10
Potential seaweed-based synthetic textile market - 0.86 -
Table 3. State of the Market of global fibers, grouped into polyester and natural fibers; and biosynthetic textiles. The market of seaweed-based fibers is currently too small to be quantified. *Growth rate used is from global fiber market. Sources: Grand View Research (2026), Textile Exchange (2024) World Bank (2023) Fashion and clothing segment makes up 52.8% of the textile fiber market in 2024, and consumer habits/preferences are shifting in favor of greener, sustainable products that promote circular economies and zero waste (Todeschini et al., 2017; Grand View Research, 2026). Notable examples have already been seen by fast fashion giants like C&A’s 2014 program and H&M’s commitment to manufacture goods from 100% circular and sustainably sourced materials by 2030 (H&M, 2025). Seaweed-based fibers can speak to the circular economy and zero waste desires of consumers, but only if its durability, design, and price is competitive with conventional materials. Current small-scale production is not economically viable, and more techno-economic studies are needed to evaluate costs at scale.
State of the Market USD value in billions (2024) USD value in billions (2030) Growth rate 2025–2030 (%)
Global fiber market 48.7 63.4 4.5
Polyester fiber 20.4 26.6 4.5*
Natural fibers 9.7 12.5 4.3
Seaweed-based fibers
Global biosynthetic textile market 20.8 36.8 10
Potential seaweed-based synthetic textile market - 0.86 -
Table 3. State of the Market of global fibers, grouped into polyester and natural fibers; and biosynthetic textiles. The market of seaweed-based fibers is currently too small to be quantified. *Growth rate used is from global fiber market. Sources: Grand View Research (2026), Textile Exchange (2024) World Bank (2023)

Costs and market adoption

Fashion and clothing segment makes up 52.8% of the textile fiber market in 2024, and consumer habits/preferences are shifting in favor of greener, sustainable products that promote circular economies and zero waste (Todeschini et al., 2017; Grand View Research, 2026). Notable examples have already been seen by fast fashion giants like C&A’s 2014 program and H&M’s commitment to manufacture goods from 100% circular and sustainably sourced materials by 2030 (H&M, 2025). Seaweed-based fibers can speak to the circular economy and zero waste desires of consumers, but only if its durability, design, and price is competitive with conventional materials. Current small-scale production is not economically viable, and more techno-economic studies are needed to evaluate costs at scale.

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Mitigation Potential

Context

According to the Apparel Impact Institute (2025), more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the apparel sector is generated from raw material extraction (22%, 209 million tons CO2e) and processing (15%, 139 million tons CO2e). In 2023, the apparel sector produced 944 million tons of GHG emissions, representing approximately 1.8% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). More than 720 million tons stem from fossil-fuel-based (polyester) and cotton fiber production (see Figure 3).

Figure 3. 2023 global apparel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (million tons CO2e, Mt), grouped by polyester, cotton, and other fibers. Source: Apparel Impact Institute (2025)

 

Emissions Reduction Potential

Scenario Basis  Mitigation Potential Key condition
WB 2030 central market — vs polyester (primary scenario)  Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal and Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.012 Mt CO2e/yr LCA stops at fiber gate; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
WB 2030 central market — vs cotton  Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal and Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.03 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton higher GWP than polyester; same LCA caveat; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
2050 Scenario-10 X 2030 sce WB 2030 central market — vs cotton Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal and Sethi (2026)  ~0.15-0.34 Mt CO2e/yr 13% growth rate in market for seaweed products from 2030. Seaweed inclusion ~10%

 

Evidence Base

We use LCA data from raw material extraction and the Lyocell fiber production method to estimate what the global warming potential of seaweed-based fibers would be. Combining the global warming potential of refined sodium alginate extraction with commercial scale lyocell production yields an estimated climate impact of 3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber, in contrast to 5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber and 7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber produced by polyester and cotton methods, respectively (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Ayala et al., 2024; Agarwal and Sethi, 2026).

Figure 4. GHG emissions intensity (kg CO₂e / kg fiber) for conventional cotton, polyester, and seaweed-based fiber at pilot and commercial scale. Dashed line marks the commercial-scale seaweed target. Sources: Ayala et al. (2024), Gonzalez et al. (2023), Agarwal and Sethi (2026)

 

 

Calculation Chain

Step 1 — Displacement factor derivation

The functional unit is kg CO2e per kg of finished fiber (cradle-to-fiber-gate). This is the boundary used by the primary LCA sources. It excludes weaving, dyeing, garment manufacture, consumer use, and end-of-life — meaning all estimates are upper bounds on the full lifecycle benefit.

 

Parameter Value Note
Seaweed fiber GWP  3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber Combines Gonzalez et al. (2023) seaweed fiber LCA with Ayala et al. (2024) alginate processing; cradle-to-fiber-gate; commercial-scale assumption
Polyester fiber GWP  5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber Virgin polyester (PET); cradle-to-fiber-gate; consistent boundary with seaweed figure; independently supported by Gonzalez et al. (2023) (~4.5 kg CO2e/kg)
Cotton fiber GWP  7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber Conventional cotton; cradle-to-fiber-gate; includes agricultural stage (irrigation, fertilizer, N₂O) + ginning/spinning
Displacement factor vs polyester 5.09 − 3.36 = 1.73 kg CO2e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing polyester
Displacement factor vs cotton 7.47 − 3.36 = 4.11 kg CO2e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing cotton; 2.4× larger than polyester displacement

 

Step 2 — WB 2030 central market scenario

Parameter Value Note
WB 2030 biosynthetic textile market $860M World Bank (2023); seaweed fiber component of broader biosynthetic textile market
Assumed product price $12/kg Consistent with roadmap WB market assumptions; premium fiber market (comparable to specialty cellulose fibers)
Product volume $860M ÷ $12/kg = ~71,667 t fiber/yr WB market ÷ assumed price = product volume
Gross mitigation vs polyester 71,667 t × 1.73 kg CO2e/kg = ~123,983 t CO2e/yr = 0.124 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs polyester incumbent
Gross mitigation vs cotton 71,667 t × 4.11 kg CO2e/kg = ~294,553 t CO2e/yr = 0.295 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs cotton incumbent
Adjusted for actual seaweed inclusion (~10% average; real market composition) Polyester: 0.12 × 0.10 = ~0.012 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton: 0.3 × 0.10 = ~0.03 Mt CO₂e/yr At 10% seaweed inclusion in commercial products; most commercially active products are 4–10% seaweed

 

Step 3- 2050 Scenario

 

Parameter Value Note
Annual Growth Rate from 2030 to 2050 13% Assumption: Growth rate similar to that for  biostimulants
2050 seaweed biosynthetic textile market $9.9B
Product volume $9.9B ÷ $12/kg = ~825000 t fiber/yr WB market ÷ assumed price = product volume
Gross mitigation vs polyester 825000t × 1.73 kg CO2e/kg = ~1470000 t CO2e/yr = 1.47 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs polyester incumbent
Gross mitigation vs cotton 825000 t × 4.11 kg CO2e/kg = ~3390750 t CO2e/yr = 3.39 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs cotton incumbent
Adjusted for actual seaweed inclusion (~10% average; real market composition) Polyester: 1.47 × 0.10 = ~0.147 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton: 3.39 × 0.10 = ~0.339 Mt CO₂e/yr At 10% seaweed inclusion in commercial products; most commercially active products are 4–10% seaweed

 

Context

According to the Apparel Impact Institute (2025), more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the apparel sector is generated from raw material extraction (22%, 209 million tons CO2e) and processing (15%, 139 million tons CO2e). In 2023, the apparel sector produced 944 million tons of GHG emissions, representing approximately 1.8% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). More than 720 million tons stem from fossil-fuel-based (polyester) and cotton fiber production (see Figure 3). [caption id="attachment_12451" align="aligncenter" width="640"] Figure 3. 2023 global apparel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (million tons CO2e, Mt), grouped by polyester, cotton, and other fibers. Source: Apparel Impact Institute (2025)[/caption]  

Emissions Reduction Potential

Scenario Basis  Mitigation Potential Key condition
WB 2030 central market — vs polyester (primary scenario)  Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal and Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.012 Mt CO2e/yr LCA stops at fiber gate; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
WB 2030 central market — vs cotton  Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal and Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.03 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton higher GWP than polyester; same LCA caveat; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
2050 Scenario-10 X 2030 sce WB 2030 central market — vs cotton Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal and Sethi (2026)  ~0.15-0.34 Mt CO2e/yr 13% growth rate in market for seaweed products from 2030. Seaweed inclusion ~10%
 

Evidence Base

We use LCA data from raw material extraction and the Lyocell fiber production method to estimate what the global warming potential of seaweed-based fibers would be. Combining the global warming potential of refined sodium alginate extraction with commercial scale lyocell production yields an estimated climate impact of 3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber, in contrast to 5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber and 7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber produced by polyester and cotton methods, respectively (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Ayala et al., 2024; Agarwal and Sethi, 2026). [caption id="attachment_12453" align="aligncenter" width="1379"] Figure 4. GHG emissions intensity (kg CO₂e / kg fiber) for conventional cotton, polyester, and seaweed-based fiber at pilot and commercial scale. Dashed line marks the commercial-scale seaweed target. Sources: Ayala et al. (2024), Gonzalez et al. (2023), Agarwal and Sethi (2026)[/caption]    

Calculation Chain

Step 1 — Displacement factor derivation

The functional unit is kg CO2e per kg of finished fiber (cradle-to-fiber-gate). This is the boundary used by the primary LCA sources. It excludes weaving, dyeing, garment manufacture, consumer use, and end-of-life — meaning all estimates are upper bounds on the full lifecycle benefit.  
Parameter Value Note
Seaweed fiber GWP  3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber Combines Gonzalez et al. (2023) seaweed fiber LCA with Ayala et al. (2024) alginate processing; cradle-to-fiber-gate; commercial-scale assumption
Polyester fiber GWP  5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber Virgin polyester (PET); cradle-to-fiber-gate; consistent boundary with seaweed figure; independently supported by Gonzalez et al. (2023) (~4.5 kg CO2e/kg)
Cotton fiber GWP  7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber Conventional cotton; cradle-to-fiber-gate; includes agricultural stage (irrigation, fertilizer, N₂O) + ginning/spinning
Displacement factor vs polyester 5.09 − 3.36 = 1.73 kg CO2e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing polyester
Displacement factor vs cotton 7.47 − 3.36 = 4.11 kg CO2e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing cotton; 2.4× larger than polyester displacement
 

Step 2 — WB 2030 central market scenario

Parameter Value Note
WB 2030 biosynthetic textile market $860M World Bank (2023); seaweed fiber component of broader biosynthetic textile market
Assumed product price $12/kg Consistent with roadmap WB market assumptions; premium fiber market (comparable to specialty cellulose fibers)
Product volume $860M ÷ $12/kg = ~71,667 t fiber/yr WB market ÷ assumed price = product volume
Gross mitigation vs polyester 71,667 t × 1.73 kg CO2e/kg = ~123,983 t CO2e/yr = 0.124 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs polyester incumbent
Gross mitigation vs cotton 71,667 t × 4.11 kg CO2e/kg = ~294,553 t CO2e/yr = 0.295 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs cotton incumbent
Adjusted for actual seaweed inclusion (~10% average; real market composition) Polyester: 0.12 × 0.10 = ~0.012 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton: 0.3 × 0.10 = ~0.03 Mt CO₂e/yr At 10% seaweed inclusion in commercial products; most commercially active products are 4–10% seaweed
  Step 3- 2050 Scenario  
Parameter Value Note
Annual Growth Rate from 2030 to 2050 13% Assumption: Growth rate similar to that for  biostimulants
2050 seaweed biosynthetic textile market $9.9B
Product volume $9.9B ÷ $12/kg = ~825000 t fiber/yr WB market ÷ assumed price = product volume
Gross mitigation vs polyester 825000t × 1.73 kg CO2e/kg = ~1470000 t CO2e/yr = 1.47 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs polyester incumbent
Gross mitigation vs cotton 825000 t × 4.11 kg CO2e/kg = ~3390750 t CO2e/yr = 3.39 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs cotton incumbent
Adjusted for actual seaweed inclusion (~10% average; real market composition) Polyester: 1.47 × 0.10 = ~0.147 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton: 3.39 × 0.10 = ~0.339 Mt CO₂e/yr At 10% seaweed inclusion in commercial products; most commercially active products are 4–10% seaweed
 

Context

According to the Apparel Impact Institute (2025), more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the apparel sector is generated from raw material extraction (22%, 209 million tons CO2e) and processing (15%, 139 million tons CO2e). In 2023, the apparel sector produced 944 million tons of GHG emissions, representing approximately 1.8% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). More than 720 million tons stem from fossil-fuel-based (polyester) and cotton fiber production (see Figure 3). [caption id="attachment_12451" align="aligncenter" width="640"] Figure 3. 2023 global apparel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (million tons CO2e, Mt), grouped by polyester, cotton, and other fibers. Source: Apparel Impact Institute (2025)[/caption]  

Emissions Reduction Potential

Scenario Basis  Mitigation Potential Key condition
WB 2030 central market — vs polyester (primary scenario)  Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal and Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.012 Mt CO2e/yr LCA stops at fiber gate; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
WB 2030 central market — vs cotton  Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal and Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.03 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton higher GWP than polyester; same LCA caveat; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
2050 Scenario-10 X 2030 sce  
 

Evidence Base

We use LCA data from raw material extraction and the Lyocell fiber production method to estimate what the global warming potential of seaweed-based fibers would be. Combining the global warming potential of refined sodium alginate extraction with commercial scale lyocell production yields an estimated climate impact of 3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber, in contrast to 5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber and 7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber produced by polyester and cotton methods, respectively (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Ayala et al., 2024; Agarwal and Sethi, 2026). [caption id="attachment_12453" align="aligncenter" width="1379"] Figure 4. GHG emissions intensity (kg CO₂e / kg fiber) for conventional cotton, polyester, and seaweed-based fiber at pilot and commercial scale. Dashed line marks the commercial-scale seaweed target. Sources: Ayala et al. (2024), Gonzalez et al. (2023), Agarwal and Sethi (2026)[/caption]    

Calculation Chain

Step 1 — Displacement factor derivation

The functional unit is kg CO2e per kg of finished fiber (cradle-to-fiber-gate). This is the boundary used by the primary LCA sources. It excludes weaving, dyeing, garment manufacture, consumer use, and end-of-life — meaning all estimates are upper bounds on the full lifecycle benefit.  
Parameter Value Note
Seaweed fiber GWP  3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber Combines Gonzalez et al. (2023) seaweed fiber LCA with Ayala et al. (2024) alginate processing; cradle-to-fiber-gate; commercial-scale assumption
Polyester fiber GWP  5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber Virgin polyester (PET); cradle-to-fiber-gate; consistent boundary with seaweed figure; independently supported by Gonzalez et al. (2023) (~4.5 kg CO2e/kg)
Cotton fiber GWP  7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber Conventional cotton; cradle-to-fiber-gate; includes agricultural stage (irrigation, fertilizer, N₂O) + ginning/spinning
Displacement factor vs polyester 5.09 − 3.36 = 1.73 kg CO2e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing polyester
Displacement factor vs cotton 7.47 − 3.36 = 4.11 kg CO2e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing cotton; 2.4× larger than polyester displacement
 

Step 2 — WB 2030 central market scenario

Parameter Value Note
WB 2030 biosynthetic textile market $860M World Bank (2023); seaweed fiber component of broader biosynthetic textile market
Assumed product price $12/kg Consistent with roadmap WB market assumptions; premium fiber market (comparable to specialty cellulose fibers)
Product volume $860M ÷ $12/kg = ~71,667 t fiber/yr WB market ÷ assumed price = product volume
Gross mitigation vs polyester 71,667 t × 1,000 kg/t × 1.73 kg CO2e/kg = ~123,983 t CO2e/yr = 0.124 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs polyester incumbent
Gross mitigation vs cotton 71,667 t × 4.11 kg CO2e/kg = ~294,553 t CO2e/yr = 0.295 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs cotton incumbent
Adjusted for actual seaweed inclusion (~10% average; real market composition) Polyester: 0.12 × 0.10 = ~0.012 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton: 0.3 × 0.10 = ~0.03 Mt CO₂e/yr At 10% seaweed inclusion in commercial products; most commercially active products are 4–10% seaweed
  Step 3- 2050 Scenario  
Parameter Value Note
Annual Growth Rate from 2030 to 2050 13% Assumption: Growth rate
Assumed product price $12/kg Consistent with roadmap WB market assumptions; premium fiber market (comparable to specialty cellulose fibers)
Product volume $860M ÷ $12/kg = ~71,667 t fiber/yr WB market ÷ assumed price = product volume
Gross mitigation vs polyester 71,667 t × 1,000 kg/t × 1.73 kg CO2e/kg = ~123,983 t CO2e/yr = 0.124 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs polyester incumbent
Gross mitigation vs cotton 71,667 t × 4.11 kg CO2e/kg = ~294,553 t CO2e/yr = 0.295 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs cotton incumbent
Adjusted for actual seaweed inclusion (~10% average; real market composition) Polyester: 0.12 × 0.10 = ~0.012 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton: 0.3 × 0.10 = ~0.03 Mt CO₂e/yr At 10% seaweed inclusion in commercial products; most commercially active products are 4–10% seaweed

Context

According to the Apparel Impact Institute (2025), more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the apparel sector is generated from raw material extraction (22%, 209 million tons CO2e) and processing (15%, 139 million tons CO2e). In 2023, the apparel sector produced 944 million tons of GHG emissions, representing approximately 1.8% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). More than 720 million tons stem from fossil-fuel-based (polyester) and cotton fiber production (see Figure 3). [caption id="attachment_12451" align="aligncenter" width="640"] Figure 3. 2023 global apparel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (million tons CO2e, Mt), grouped by polyester, cotton, and other fibers. Source: Apparel Impact Institute (2025)[/caption]  

Emissions Reduction Potential

Scenario Basis  Mitigation Potential Key condition
WB 2030 central market — vs polyester (primary scenario)  Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal and Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.012 Mt CO2e/yr LCA stops at fiber gate; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
WB 2030 central market — vs cotton  Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal and Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.03 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton higher GWP than polyester; same LCA caveat; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
 

Evidence Base

We use LCA data from raw material extraction and the Lyocell fiber production method to estimate what the global warming potential of seaweed-based fibers would be. Combining the global warming potential of refined sodium alginate extraction with commercial scale lyocell production yields an estimated climate impact of 3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber, in contrast to 5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber and 7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber produced by polyester and cotton methods, respectively (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Ayala et al., 2024; Agarwal and Sethi, 2026). [caption id="attachment_12453" align="aligncenter" width="1379"] Figure 4. GHG emissions intensity (kg CO₂e / kg fiber) for conventional cotton, polyester, and seaweed-based fiber at pilot and commercial scale. Dashed line marks the commercial-scale seaweed target. Sources: Ayala et al. (2024), Gonzalez et al. (2023), Agarwal and Sethi (2026)[/caption]    

Calculation Chain

Step 1 — Displacement factor derivation

The functional unit is kg CO2e per kg of finished fiber (cradle-to-fiber-gate). This is the boundary used by the primary LCA sources. It excludes weaving, dyeing, garment manufacture, consumer use, and end-of-life — meaning all estimates are upper bounds on the full lifecycle benefit.  
Parameter Value Note
Seaweed fiber GWP  3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber Combines Gonzalez et al. (2023) seaweed fiber LCA with Ayala et al. (2024) alginate processing; cradle-to-fiber-gate; commercial-scale assumption
Polyester fiber GWP  5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber Virgin polyester (PET); cradle-to-fiber-gate; consistent boundary with seaweed figure; independently supported by Gonzalez et al. (2023) (~4.5 kg CO2e/kg)
Cotton fiber GWP  7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber Conventional cotton; cradle-to-fiber-gate; includes agricultural stage (irrigation, fertilizer, N₂O) + ginning/spinning
Displacement factor vs polyester 5.09 − 3.36 = 1.73 kg CO2e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing polyester
Displacement factor vs cotton 7.47 − 3.36 = 4.11 kg CO2e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing cotton; 2.4× larger than polyester displacement
 

Step 2 — WB 2030 central market scenario

Parameter Value Note
WB 2030 biosynthetic textile market $860M World Bank (2023); seaweed fiber component of broader biosynthetic textile market
Assumed product price $12/kg Consistent with roadmap WB market assumptions; premium fiber market (comparable to specialty cellulose fibers)
Product volume $860M ÷ $12/kg = ~71,667 t fiber/yr WB market ÷ assumed price = product volume
Gross mitigation vs polyester 71,667 t × 1,000 kg/t × 1.73 kg CO2e/kg = ~123,983 t CO2e/yr = 0.124 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs polyester incumbent
Gross mitigation vs cotton 71,667 t × 4.11 kg CO2e/kg = ~294,553 t CO2e/yr = 0.295 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs cotton incumbent
Adjusted for actual seaweed inclusion (~10% average; real market composition) Polyester: 0.12 × 0.10 = ~0.012 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton: 0.3 × 0.10 = ~0.03 Mt CO₂e/yr At 10% seaweed inclusion in commercial products; most commercially active products are 4–10% seaweed
 

Context

According to the Apparel Impact Institute (2025), more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the apparel sector is generated from raw material extraction (22%, 209 million tons CO2e) and processing (15%, 139 million tons CO2e). In 2023, the apparel sector produced 944 million tons of GHG emissions, representing approximately 1.8% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). More than 720 million tons stem from fossil-fuel-based (polyester) and cotton fiber production (see Figure 3). [caption id="attachment_12451" align="aligncenter" width="640"] Figure 3. 2023 global apparel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (million tons CO2e, Mt), grouped by polyester, cotton, and other fibers. Source: Apparel Impact Institute (2025)[/caption]  

Emissions Reduction Potential

Scenario Basis  Mitigation Potential Key condition
WB 2030 central market — vs polyester (primary scenario)  Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal and Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.012 Mt CO2e/yr LCA stops at fiber gate; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
WB 2030 central market — vs cotton  Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal and Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.03 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton higher GWP than polyester; same LCA caveat; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
 

Evidence Base

We use LCA data from raw material extraction and the Lyocell fiber production method to estimate what the global warming potential of seaweed-based fibers would be. Combining the global warming potential of refined sodium alginate extraction with commercial-scale lyocell production yields an estimated climate impact of 3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber, in contrast to 5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber and 7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber produced by polyester and cotton methods, respectively (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Ayala et al., 2024; Agarwal and Sethi, 2026). [caption id="attachment_12453" align="aligncenter" width="1379"] Figure 4. GHG emissions intensity (kg CO₂e / kg fiber) for conventional cotton, polyester, and seaweed-based fiber at pilot and commercial scale. Dashed line marks the commercial-scale seaweed target. Sources: Ayala et al. (2024), Gonzalez et al. (2023), Agarwal and Sethi (2026)[/caption]    

Calculation Chain

Step 1 — Displacement factor derivation

The functional unit is kg CO2e per kg of finished fiber (cradle-to-fiber-gate). This is the boundary used by the primary LCA sources. It excludes weaving, dyeing, garment manufacture, consumer use, and end-of-life — meaning all estimates are upper bounds on the full lifecycle benefit.  
Parameter Value Note
Seaweed fiber GWP  3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber Combines Gonzalez et al. (2023) seaweed fiber LCA with Ayala et al. (2024) alginate processing; cradle-to-fiber-gate; commercial-scale assumption
Polyester fiber GWP  5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber Virgin polyester (PET); cradle-to-fiber-gate; consistent boundary with seaweed figure; independently supported by Gonzalez et al. (2023) (~4.5 kg CO2e/kg)
Cotton fiber GWP  7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber Conventional cotton; cradle-to-fiber-gate; includes agricultural stage (irrigation, fertilizer, N₂O) + ginning/spinning
Displacement factor vs polyester 5.09 − 3.36 = 1.73 kg CO2e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing polyester
Displacement factor vs cotton 7.47 − 3.36 = 4.11 kg CO2e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing cotton; 2.4× larger than polyester displacement
 

Step 2 — WB 2030 central market scenario

Parameter Value Note
WB 2030 biosynthetic textile market $860M World Bank (2023); seaweed fiber component of broader biosynthetic textile market
Assumed product price $12/kg Consistent with roadmap WB market assumptions; premium fiber market (comparable to specialty cellulose fibers)
Product volume $860M ÷ $12/kg = ~71,667 t fiber/yr WB market ÷ assumed price = product volume
Gross mitigation vs polyester 71,667 t × 1,000 kg/t × 1.73 kg CO2e/kg = ~123,983 t CO2e/yr = 0.124 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs polyester incumbent
Gross mitigation vs cotton 71,667 t × 4.11 kg CO2e/kg = ~294,553 t CO2e/yr = 0.295 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs cotton incumbent
Adjusted for actual seaweed inclusion (~10% average; real market composition) Polyester: 0.12 × 0.10 = ~0.012 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton: 0.3 × 0.10 = ~0.03 Mt CO₂e/yr At 10% seaweed inclusion in commercial products; most commercially active products are 4–10% seaweed
 

Context

According to the Apparel Impact Institute (2025), more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the apparel sector is generated from raw material extraction (22%, 209 million tons CO2e) and processing (15%, 139 million tons CO2e). In 2023, the apparel sector produced 944 million tons of GHG emissions, representing approximately 1.8% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). More than 720 million tons stem from fossil-fuel-based (polyester) and cotton fiber production (see Figure 3). [caption id="attachment_12451" align="aligncenter" width="640"] Figure 3. 2023 global apparel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (million tons CO2e, Mt), grouped by polyester, cotton, and other fibers. Source: Apparel Impact Institute (2025)[/caption]  

Emissions Reduction Potential

Scenario Basis  Mitigation Potential Key condition
WB 2030 central market — vs polyester (primary scenario) Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal & Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.012 Mt CO2e/yr LCA stops at fiber gate; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
WB 2030 central market — vs cotton Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal & Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.03 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton higher GWP than polyester; same LCA caveat; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
 

Evidence Base

We use LCA data from raw material extraction and the Lyocell fiber production method to estimate what the global warming potential of seaweed-based fibers would be. Combining the global warming potential of refined sodium alginate extraction with commercial-scale lyocell production yields an estimated climate impact of 3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber, in contrast to 5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber and 7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber produced by polyester and cotton methods, respectively (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Ayala et al., 2024; Agarwal and Sethi, 2026). Gonzalez et al. (2023). [caption id="attachment_12453" align="aligncenter" width="1379"] Figure 4. GHG emissions intensity (kg CO₂e / kg fiber) for conventional cotton, polyester, and seaweed-based fiber at pilot and commercial scale. Dashed line marks the commercial-scale seaweed target. Sources: Ayala et al. (2024), Gonzalez et al. (2023), Agarwal and Sethi (2026)[/caption]    

Calculation Chain

Step 1 — Displacement factor derivation

The functional unit is kg CO2e per kg of finished fiber (cradle-to-fiber-gate). This is the boundary used by the primary LCA sources. It excludes weaving, dyeing, garment manufacture, consumer use, and end-of-life — meaning all estimates are upper bounds on the full lifecycle benefit.  
Parameter Value Note
Seaweed fiber GWP  3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber Combines Gonzalez et al. (2023) seaweed fiber LCA with Ayala et al. (2024) alginate processing; cradle-to-fiber-gate; commercial-scale assumption
Polyester fiber GWP  5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber Virgin polyester (PET); cradle-to-fiber-gate; consistent boundary with seaweed figure; independently supported by Gonzalez et al. (2023) (~4.5 kg CO2e/kg)
Cotton fiber GWP  7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber Conventional cotton; cradle-to-fiber-gate; includes agricultural stage (irrigation, fertiliser, N₂O) + ginning/spinning
Displacement factor vs polyester 5.09 − 3.36 = 1.73 kg CO2e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing polyester
Displacement factor vs cotton 7.47 − 3.36 = 4.11 kg CO2e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing cotton; 2.4× larger than polyester displacement
 

Step 2 — WB 2030 central market scenario

Parameter Value Note
WB 2030 biosynthetic textile market $860M World Bank (2023); seaweed fiber component of broader biosynthetic textile market
Assumed product price $12/kg Consistent with roadmap WB market assumptions; premium fiber market (comparable to specialty cellulose fibers)
Product volume $860M ÷ $12/kg = ~71,667 t fiber/yr WB market ÷ assumed price = product volume
Gross mitigation vs polyester 71,667 t × 1,000 kg/t × 1.73 kg CO2e/kg = ~123,983 t CO2e/yr = 0.124 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs polyester incumbent
Gross mitigation vs cotton 71,667 t × 4.11 kg CO2e/kg = ~294,553 t CO2e/yr = 0.295 Mt CO2e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs cotton incumbent
Adjusted for actual seaweed inclusion (~10% average; real market composition) Polyester: 0.12 × 0.10 = ~0.012 Mt CO2e/yr Cotton: 0.3 × 0.10 = ~0.03 Mt CO₂e/yr At 10% seaweed inclusion in commercial products; most commercially active products are 4–10% seaweed
 

Context

According to the Apparel Impact Institute (2025), more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the apparel sector is generated from raw material extraction (22%, 209 million tons CO2e) and processing (15%, 139 million tons CO2e). In 2023, the apparel sector produced 944 million tons of GHG emissions, representing approximately 1.8% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). More than 720 million tons stem from fossil-fuel-based (polyester) and cotton fiber production (see Figure 3). [caption id="attachment_12451" align="aligncenter" width="640"] Figure 3. 2023 global apparel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (million tons CO2e, Mt), grouped by polyester, cotton, and other fibers. Source: Apparel Impact Institute (2025)[/caption]  

Emissions Reduction Potential

Scenario Basis / Source Emissions Reduction Potential Mt CO₂e/yr Key condition
WB 2030 central market — vs polyester (primary scenario) Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal & Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.012 Mt CO₂e/yr LCA stops at fiber gate; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
WB 2030 central market — vs cotton Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal & Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.03 Mt CO₂e/yr Cotton higher GWP than polyester; same LCA caveat; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
 

Evidence Base

We use LCA data from raw material extraction and the Lyocell fiber production method to estimate what the global warming potential of seaweed-based fibers would be. Combining the global warming potential of refined sodium alginate extraction with commercial-scale lyocell production yields an estimated climate impact of 3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber, in contrast to 5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber and 7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber produced by polyester and cotton methods, respectively  (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Ayala et al., 2024; Agarwal and Sethi, 2026). Gonzalez et al. (2023). [caption id="attachment_12453" align="aligncenter" width="1379"] Figure 4. GHG emissions intensity (kg CO₂e / kg fiber) for conventional cotton, polyester, and seaweed-based fiber at pilot and commercial scale. Dashed line marks the commercial-scale seaweed target. Sources: Ayala et al. (2024), Gonzalez et al. (2023), Agarwal and Sethi (2026)[/caption]    

Calculation Chain

Step 1 — Displacement factor derivation

The functional unit is kg CO₂e per kg of finished fiber (cradle-to-fiber-gate). This is the boundary used by the primary LCA sources. It excludes weaving, dyeing, garment manufacture, consumer use, and end-of-life — meaning all estimates are upper bounds on the full lifecycle benefit.  
Parameter Value Note
Seaweed fiber GWP  3.36 kg CO₂e/kg fiber Combines Gonzalez et al. (2023) seaweed fiber LCA with Ayala et al. (2024) alginate processing; cradle-to-fiber-gate; commercial-scale assumption
Polyester fiber GWP  5.09 kg CO₂e/kg fiber Virgin polyester (PET); cradle-to-fiber-gate; consistent boundary with seaweed figure; independently supported by Gonzalez et al. (~4.5 kg CO₂e/kg)
Cotton fiber GWP  7.47 kg CO₂e/kg fiber Conventional cotton; cradle-to-fiber-gate; includes agricultural stage (irrigation, fertiliser, N₂O) + ginning/spinning
Displacement factor vs polyester 5.09 − 3.36 = 1.73 kg CO₂e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing polyester
Displacement factor vs cotton 7.47 − 3.36 = 4.11 kg CO₂e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing cotton; 2.4× larger than polyester displacement
 

Step 2 — WB 2030 central market scenario

Parameter Value Note
WB 2030 biosynthetic textile market $860M World Bank (2023); seaweed fiber component of broader biosynthetic textile market
Assumed product price $12/kg Consistent with roadmap WB market assumptions; premium fiber market (comparable to specialty cellulose fibers)
Product volume $860M ÷ $12/kg = ~71,667 t fiber/yr WB market ÷ assumed price = product volume
Gross mitigation vs polyester 71,667 t × 1,000 kg/t × 1.73 kg CO₂e/kg = ~123,983 t CO₂e/yr = 0.124 Mt CO₂e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs polyester incumbent
Gross mitigation vs cotton 71,667 t × 4.11 kg CO₂e/kg = ~294,553 t CO₂e/yr = 0.295 Mt CO₂e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs cotton incumbent
Adjusted for actual seaweed inclusion (~10% average; real market composition) Polyester: 0.12 × 0.10 = ~0.012 Mt CO₂e/yr Cotton: 0.3 × 0.10 = ~0.03 Mt CO₂e/yr At 10% seaweed inclusion in commercial products; most commercially active products are 4–10% seaweed
 

Context

According to the Apparel Impact Institute (2025), more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the apparel sector is generated from raw material extraction (22%, 209 million tons CO2e) and processing (15%, 139 million tons CO2e). In 2023, the apparel sector produced 944 million tons of GHG emissions, representing approximately 1.8% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). More than 720 million tons stem from fossil-fuel-based (polyester) and cotton fiber production (see Figure 3). [caption id="attachment_12451" align="aligncenter" width="640"] Figure 3. 2023 global apparel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (million tons CO2e, Mt), grouped by polyester, cotton, and other fibers. Source: Apparel Impact Institute (2025)[/caption]  

Emissions Reduction Potential

Scenario Basis / Source Emissions Reduction Potential Mt CO₂e/yr Key condition
WB 2030 central market — vs polyester (primary scenario) Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal & Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.012 Mt CO₂e/yr LCA stops at fiber gate; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
WB 2030 central market — vs cotton Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal & Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.03 Mt CO₂e/yr Cotton higher GWP than polyester; same LCA caveat; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
   

Evidence Base

We use LCA data from raw material extraction and the Lyocell fiber production method to estimate what the global warming potential of seaweed-based fibers would be. Combining the global warming potential of refined sodium alginate extraction with commercial-scale lyocell production yields an estimated climate impact of 3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber, in contrast to 5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber and 7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber produced by polyester and cotton methods, respectively  (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Ayala et al., 2024; Agarwal and Sethi, 2026). Gonzalez et al. (2023). [caption id="attachment_12453" align="aligncenter" width="1379"] Figure 4. GHG emissions intensity (kg CO₂e / kg fiber) for conventional cotton, polyester, and seaweed-based fiber at pilot and commercial scale. Dashed line marks the commercial-scale seaweed target. Sources: Ayala et al. (2024), Gonzalez et al. (2023), Agarwal and Sethi (2026)[/caption]    

Calculation Chain

Step 1 — Displacement factor derivation

The functional unit is kg CO₂e per kg of finished fiber (cradle-to-fiber-gate). This is the boundary used by the primary LCA sources. It excludes weaving, dyeing, garment manufacture, consumer use, and end-of-life — meaning all estimates are upper bounds on the full lifecycle benefit.  
Parameter Value Note
Seaweed fiber GWP  3.36 kg CO₂e/kg fiber Combines Gonzalez et al. (2023) seaweed fiber LCA with Ayala et al. (2024) alginate processing; cradle-to-fiber-gate; commercial-scale assumption
Polyester fiber GWP  5.09 kg CO₂e/kg fiber Virgin polyester (PET); cradle-to-fiber-gate; consistent boundary with seaweed figure; independently supported by Gonzalez et al. (~4.5 kg CO₂e/kg)
Cotton fiber GWP  7.47 kg CO₂e/kg fiber Conventional cotton; cradle-to-fiber-gate; includes agricultural stage (irrigation, fertiliser, N₂O) + ginning/spinning
Displacement factor vs polyester 5.09 − 3.36 = 1.73 kg CO₂e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing polyester
Displacement factor vs cotton 7.47 − 3.36 = 4.11 kg CO₂e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing cotton; 2.4× larger than polyester displacement
 

Step 2 — WB 2030 central market scenario

Parameter Value Note
WB 2030 biosynthetic textile market $860M World Bank (2023); seaweed fiber component of broader biosynthetic textile market
Assumed product price $12/kg Consistent with roadmap WB market assumptions; premium fiber market (comparable to specialty cellulose fibers)
Product volume $860M ÷ $12/kg = ~71,667 t fiber/yr WB market ÷ assumed price = product volume
Gross mitigation vs polyester 71,667 t × 1,000 kg/t × 1.73 kg CO₂e/kg = ~123,983 t CO₂e/yr = 0.124 Mt CO₂e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs polyester incumbent
Gross mitigation vs cotton 71,667 t × 4.11 kg CO₂e/kg = ~294,553 t CO₂e/yr = 0.295 Mt CO₂e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs cotton incumbent
Adjusted for actual seaweed inclusion (~10% average; real market composition) Polyester: 0.12 × 0.10 = ~0.012 Mt CO₂e/yr Cotton: 0.3 × 0.10 = ~0.03 Mt CO₂e/yr At 10% seaweed inclusion in commercial products; most commercially active products are 4–10% seaweed
 

Context

According to the Apparel Impact Institute (2025), more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the apparel sector is generated from raw material extraction (22%, 209 million tons CO2e) and processing (15%, 139 million tons CO2e). In 2023, the apparel sector produced 944 million tons of GHG emissions, representing approximately 1.8% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). More than 720 million tons stem from fossil-fuel-based (polyester) and cotton fiber production (see Figure 3). [caption id="attachment_12451" align="aligncenter" width="640"] Figure 3. 2023 global apparel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (million tons CO2e, Mt), grouped by polyester, cotton, and other fibers. Source: Apparel Impact Institute (2025)[/caption]  

Emissions Reduction Potential

Scenario Basis / Source Emissions Reduction Potential Mt CO₂e/yr Key condition
WB 2030 central market — vs polyester (primary scenario) Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal & Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.012 Mt CO₂e/yr LCA stops at fiber gate; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
WB 2030 central market — vs cotton Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal & Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.03 Mt CO₂e/yr Cotton higher GWP than polyester; same LCA caveat; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
   

Evidence Base

We use LCA data from raw material extraction and the Lyocell fiber production method to estimate what the global warming potential of seaweed-based fibers would be. Combining the global warming potential of refined sodium alginate extraction with commercial-scale lyocell production yields an estimated climate impact of 3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber, in contrast to 5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber and 7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber produced by polyester and cotton methods, respectively  (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Ayala et al., 2024; Agarwal and Sethi, 2026). Gonzalez et al. (2023). [caption id="attachment_12453" align="aligncenter" width="1379"] Figure 4. GHG emissions intensity (kg CO₂e / kg fiber) for conventional cotton, polyester, and seaweed-based fiber at pilot and commercial scale. Dashed line marks the commercial-scale seaweed target. Sources: Ayala et al. (2024), Gonzalez et al. (2023), Agarwal and Sethi (2026)[/caption]    

Calculation Chain

Step 1 — Displacement factor derivation

The functional unit is kg CO₂e per kg of finished fiber (cradle-to-fiber-gate). This is the boundary used by the primary LCA sources. It excludes weaving, dyeing, garment manufacture, consumer use, and end-of-life — meaning all estimates are upper bounds on the full lifecycle benefit.  
Parameter Value Note
Seaweed fiber GWP  3.36 kg CO₂e/kg fiber Combines Gonzalez et al. (2023) seaweed fiber LCA with Ayala et al. (2024) alginate processing; cradle-to-fiber-gate; commercial-scale assumption
Polyester fiber GWP  5.09 kg CO₂e/kg fiber Virgin polyester (PET); cradle-to-fiber-gate; consistent boundary with seaweed figure; independently supported by Gonzalez et al. (~4.5 kg CO₂e/kg)
Cotton fiber GWP  7.47 kg CO₂e/kg fiber Conventional cotton; cradle-to-fiber-gate; includes agricultural stage (irrigation, fertiliser, N₂O) + ginning/spinning
Displacement factor vs polyester 5.09 − 3.36 = 1.73 kg CO₂e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing polyester
Displacement factor vs cotton 7.47 − 3.36 = 4.11 kg CO₂e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing cotton; 2.4× larger than polyester displacement
 

Step 2 — WB 2030 central market scenario

Parameter Value Note
WB 2030 biosynthetic textile market $860M World Bank (2023); seaweed fiber component of broader biosynthetic textile market
Assumed product price $12/kg Consistent with roadmap WB market assumptions; premium fiber market (comparable to specialty cellulose fibers)
Product volume $860M ÷ $12/kg = ~71,667 t fiber/yr WB market ÷ assumed price = product volume
Gross mitigation vs polyester 71,667 t × 1,000 kg/t × 1.73 kg CO₂e/kg = ~123,983 t CO₂e/yr = 0.124 Mt CO₂e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs polyester incumbent
Gross mitigation vs cotton 71,667 t × 4.11 kg CO₂e/kg = ~294,553 t CO₂e/yr = 0.295 Mt CO₂e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs cotton incumbent
Adjusted for actual seaweed inclusion (~10% average; real market composition) Polyester: 0.12 × 0.10 = ~0.012 Mt CO₂e/yr Cotton: 0.3 × 0.10 = ~0.03 Mt CO₂e/yr At 10% seaweed inclusion in commercial products; most commercially active products are 4–10% seaweed
 

Context

According to the Apparel Impact Institute (2025), more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the apparel sector is generated from raw material extraction (22%, 209 million tons CO2e) and processing (15%, 139 million tons CO2e). In 2023, the apparel sector produced 944 million tons of GHG emissions, representing approximately 1.8% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). More than 720 million tons stem from fossil-fuel-based (polyester) and cotton fiber production (see Figure 3). [caption id="attachment_12451" align="aligncenter" width="640"] Figure 3. 2023 global apparel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (million tons CO2e, Mt), grouped by polyester, cotton, and other fibers. Source: Apparel Impact Institute (2025)[/caption]  

Emissions Reduction Potential

Scenario Basis / Source Feasibility-adjusted (×0.75) Mt CO₂e/yr Key condition
WB 2030 central market — vs polyester (primary scenario) Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal & Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.028 Mt CO₂e/yr LCA stops at fiber gate; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
WB 2030 central market — vs cotton Gonzalez et al. (2023) + Agarwal & Sethi (2026) + WB (2023) ~0.043 Mt CO₂e/yr Cotton higher GWP than polyester; same LCA caveat; seaweed inclusion ~10% in most products
   

Evidence Base

We use LCA data from raw material extraction and the Lyocell fiber production method to estimate what the global warming potential of seaweed-based fibers would be. Combining the global warming potential of refined sodium alginate extraction with commercial-scale lyocell production yields an estimated climate impact of 3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber, in contrast to 5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber and 7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber produced by polyester and cotton methods, respectively  (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Ayala et al., 2024; Agarwal and Sethi, 2026). Gonzalez et al. (2023). [caption id="attachment_12453" align="aligncenter" width="1379"] Figure 4. GHG emissions intensity (kg CO₂e / kg fiber) for conventional cotton, polyester, and seaweed-based fiber at pilot and commercial scale. Dashed line marks the commercial-scale seaweed target. Sources: Ayala et al. (2024), Gonzalez et al. (2023), Agarwal and Sethi (2026)[/caption]    

Calculation Chain

Step 1 — Displacement factor derivation

The functional unit is kg CO₂e per kg of finished fiber (cradle-to-fiber-gate). This is the boundary used by the primary LCA sources. It excludes weaving, dyeing, garment manufacture, consumer use, and end-of-life — meaning all estimates are upper bounds on the full lifecycle benefit.  
Parameter Value Note
Seaweed fiber GWP  3.36 kg CO₂e/kg fiber Combines Gonzalez et al. (2023) seaweed fiber LCA with Ayala et al. (2024) alginate processing; cradle-to-fiber-gate; commercial-scale assumption
Polyester fiber GWP  5.09 kg CO₂e/kg fiber Virgin polyester (PET); cradle-to-fiber-gate; consistent boundary with seaweed figure; independently supported by Gonzalez et al. (~4.5 kg CO₂e/kg)
Cotton fiber GWP  7.47 kg CO₂e/kg fiber Conventional cotton; cradle-to-fiber-gate; includes agricultural stage (irrigation, fertiliser, N₂O) + ginning/spinning
Displacement factor vs polyester 5.09 − 3.36 = 1.73 kg CO₂e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing polyester
Displacement factor vs cotton 7.47 − 3.36 = 4.11 kg CO₂e/kg fiber substituted Per kg of seaweed fiber replacing cotton; 2.4× larger than polyester displacement
 

Step 2 — WB 2030 central market scenario

Parameter Value Note
WB 2030 biosynthetic textile market $860M World Bank (2023); seaweed fiber component of broader biosynthetic textile market
Assumed product price $12/kg Consistent with roadmap WB market assumptions; premium fiber market (comparable to specialty cellulose fibers)
Product volume $860M ÷ $12/kg = ~71,667 t fiber/yr WB market ÷ assumed price = product volume
Gross mitigation vs polyester 71,667 t × 1,000 kg/t × 1.73 kg CO₂e/kg = ~123,983 t CO₂e/yr = 0.124 Mt CO₂e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs polyester incumbent
Gross mitigation vs cotton 71,667 t × 4.11 kg CO₂e/kg = ~294,553 t CO₂e/yr = 0.295 Mt CO₂e/yr At 100% seaweed fiber; vs cotton incumbent
Adjusted for actual seaweed inclusion (~10% average; real market composition) Polyester: 0.12 × 0.10 = ~0.012 Mt CO₂e/yr Cotton: 0.3 × 0.10 = ~0.03 Mt CO₂e/yr At 10% seaweed inclusion in commercial products; most commercially active products are 4–10% seaweed
VERIFICATION (check 2) 71,667 t × 4.11 = 294,656 t CO₂e ÷ 1,000,000 = 0.295 Mt ✓ Cotton gross mitigation — confirmed
VERIFICATION (check 3) $860M ÷ $12 = 71,667 t ✓ 71,667 × 0.75 feasibility adj. Polyester: 71,667 × 1.73 × 0.75 = 93,000 t CO₂e ÷ 10⁶ = 0.093 ≈ 0.09 Mt ✓ All steps check independently
 
According to the Apparel Impact Institute (2025), more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the apparel sector is generated from raw material extraction (22%, 209 million tons CO2e) and processing (15%, 139 million tons CO2e). In 2023, the apparel sector produced 944 million tons of GHG emissions, representing approximately 1.8% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). More than 720 million tons stem from fossil-fuel-based (polyester) and cotton fiber production (see Figure 3). [caption id="attachment_12451" align="aligncenter" width="640"] Figure 3. 2023 global apparel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (million tons CO2e, Mt), grouped by polyester, cotton, and other fibers. Source: Apparel Impact Institute (2025)[/caption] In this section we use life cycle analyses (LCAs) to compare the global mitigation potential of substituting conventional fibers used in fabric production with seaweed-based fibers. LCAs for seaweed-based fibers stop short at fiber production; end-to-end LCAs need to be developed to better understand seaweed’s potential for producing alternative low-carbon fabrics that can mitigate global GHG emissions. Figure 4 summarizes the calculations below. We use LCA data from raw material extraction and the Lyocell fiber production method to estimate what the global warming potential of seaweed-based fibers would be. Combining the global warming potential of refined sodium alginate extraction with commercial-scale lyocell production yields an estimated climate impact of 3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber, in contrast to 5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber and 7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber produced by polyester and cotton methods, respectively  (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Ayala et al., 2024; Agarwal and Sethi, 2026). Gonzalez et al. (2023). [caption id="attachment_12453" align="aligncenter" width="1379"] Figure 4. GHG emissions intensity (kg CO₂e / kg fiber) for conventional cotton, polyester, and seaweed-based fiber at pilot and commercial scale. Dashed line marks the commercial-scale seaweed target. Sources: Ayala et al. (2024), Gonzalez et al. (2023), Agarwal and Sethi (2026)[/caption] If seaweed-based fiber production matched the climate impact of seaweed-based bioplastics at commercial scale, then substituting seaweed-based fibers for polyester and cotton in 2023 could have reduced emissions. Assuming the total global seaweed production in 2023 (36 million tons fresh weight) was available for substitution in each case, the potential mitigation would have approximated 1.2–1.4 million tons CO2e for polyester and about 2.9–3.3 million tons CO2e for cotton.
According to the Apparel Impact Institute (2025), more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the apparel sector is generated from raw material extraction (22%, 209 million tons CO2e) and processing (15%, 139 million tons CO2e). In 2023, the apparel sector produced 944 million tons of GHG emissions, representing approximately 1.8% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). More than 720 million tons stem from fossil-fuel-based (polyester) and cotton fiber production (see Figure 3). [caption id="attachment_12451" align="aligncenter" width="238"] Figure 3. 2023 global apparel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (million tons CO2e, Mt), grouped by polyester, cotton, and other fibers. Source: Apparel Impact Institute (2025)[/caption] In this section we use life cycle analyses (LCAs) to compare the global mitigation potential of substituting conventional fibers used in fabric production with seaweed-based fibers. LCAs for seaweed-based fibers stop short at fiber production; end-to-end LCAs need to be developed to better understand seaweed’s potential for producing alternative low-carbon fabrics that can mitigate global GHG emissions. Figure 4 summarizes the calculations below. We use LCA data from raw material extraction and the Lyocell fiber production method to estimate what the global warming potential of seaweed-based fibers would be. Combining the global warming potential of refined sodium alginate extraction with commercial-scale lyocell production yields an estimated climate impact of 3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber, in contrast to 5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber and 7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber produced by polyester and cotton methods, respectively  (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Ayala et al., 2024; Agarwal and Sethi, 2026). Gonzalez et al. (2023). [caption id="attachment_12453" align="aligncenter" width="1379"] Figure 4. GHG emissions intensity (kg CO₂e / kg fiber) for conventional cotton, polyester, and seaweed-based fiber at pilot and commercial scale. Dashed line marks the commercial-scale seaweed target. Sources: Ayala et al. (2024), Gonzalez et al. (2023), Agarwal and Sethi (2026)[/caption] If seaweed-based fiber production matched the climate impact of seaweed-based bioplastics at commercial scale, then substituting seaweed-based fibers for polyester and cotton in 2023 could have reduced emissions. Assuming the total global seaweed production in 2023 (36 million tons fresh weight) was available for substitution in each case, the potential mitigation would have approximated 1.2–1.4 million tons CO2e for polyester and about 2.9–3.3 million tons CO2e for cotton.
According to the Apparel Impact Institute (2025), more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the apparel sector is generated from raw material extraction (22%, 209 million tons CO2e) and processing (15%, 139 million tons CO2e). In 2023, the apparel sector produced 944 million tons of GHG emissions, representing approximately 1.8% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). More than 720 million tons stem from fossil-fuel-based (polyester) and cotton fiber production (see Figure 3). [caption id="attachment_12451" align="aligncenter" width="640"] Figure 3. 2023 global apparel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (million tons CO2e, Mt), grouped by polyester, cotton, and other fibers. Source: Apparel Impact Institute (2025)[/caption] In this section we use life cycle analyses (LCAs) to compare the global mitigation potential of substituting conventional fibers used in fabric production with seaweed-based fibers. LCAs for seaweed-based fibers stop short at fiber production; end-to-end LCAs need to be developed to better understand seaweed’s potential for producing alternative low-carbon fabrics that can mitigate global GHG emissions. Figure 4 summarizes the calculations below. We use LCA data from raw material extraction and the Lyocell fiber production method to estimate what the global warming potential of seaweed-based fibers would be. Combining the global warming potential of refined sodium alginate extraction with commercial-scale lyocell production yields an estimated climate impact of 3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber, in contrast to 5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber and 7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber produced by polyester and cotton methods, respectively  (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Ayala et al., 2024; Agarwal and Sethi, 2026). Gonzalez et al. (2023). [caption id="attachment_12453" align="aligncenter" width="1379"] Figure 4. GHG emissions intensity (kg CO₂e / kg fiber) for conventional cotton, polyester, and seaweed-based fiber at pilot and commercial scale. Dashed line marks the commercial-scale seaweed target. Sources: Ayala et al. (2024), Gonzalez et al. (2023), Agarwal and Sethi (2026)[/caption] If seaweed-based fiber production matched the climate impact of seaweed-based bioplastics at commercial scale, then substituting seaweed-based fibers for polyester and cotton in 2023 could have reduced emissions. Assuming the total global seaweed production in 2023 (36 million tons fresh weight) was available for substitution in each case, the potential mitigation would have approximated 1.2–1.4 million tons CO2e for polyester and about 2.9–3.3 million tons CO2e for cotton.
According to the Apparel Impact Institute (2025), more than a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the apparel sector is generated from raw material extraction (22%, 209 million tons CO2e) and processing (15%, 139 million tons CO2e). In 2023, the apparel sector produced 944 million tons of GHG emissions, representing approximately 1.8% of the global carbon footprint (Apparel Impact Institute, 2025). More than 720 million tons stem from fossil-fuel-based (polyester) and cotton fiber production (see Figure 3). [caption id="attachment_12451" align="aligncenter" width="858"] Figure 3. 2023 global apparel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (million tons CO2e, Mt), grouped by polyester, cotton, and other fibers. Source: Apparel Impact Institute (2025)[/caption] In this section we use life cycle analyses (LCAs) to compare the global mitigation potential of substituting conventional fibers used in fabric production with seaweed-based fibers. LCAs for seaweed-based fibers stop short at fiber production; end-to-end LCAs need to be developed to better understand seaweed’s potential for producing alternative low-carbon fabrics that can mitigate global GHG emissions. Figure 4 summarizes the calculations below. We use LCA data from raw material extraction and the Lyocell fiber production method to estimate what the global warming potential of seaweed-based fibers would be. Combining the global warming potential of refined sodium alginate extraction with commercial-scale lyocell production yields an estimated climate impact of 3.36 kg CO2e/kg fiber, in contrast to 5.09 kg CO2e/kg fiber and 7.47 kg CO2e/kg fiber produced by polyester and cotton methods, respectively  (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Ayala et al., 2024; Agarwal and Sethi, 2026). Gonzalez et al. (2023). [caption id="attachment_12453" align="aligncenter" width="1379"] Figure 4. GHG emissions intensity (kg CO₂e / kg fiber) for conventional cotton, polyester, and seaweed-based fiber at pilot and commercial scale. Dashed line marks the commercial-scale seaweed target. Sources: Ayala et al. (2024), Gonzalez et al. (2023), Agarwal and Sethi (2026)[/caption] If seaweed-based fiber production matched the climate impact of seaweed-based bioplastics at commercial scale, then substituting seaweed-based fibers for polyester and cotton in 2023 could have reduced emissions. Assuming the total global seaweed production in 2023 (36 million tons fresh weight) was available for substitution in each case, the potential mitigation would have approximated 1.2–1.4 million tons CO2e for polyester and about 2.9–3.3 million tons CO2e for cotton.
Table 3 below summarizes the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of fibers with seaweed inclusion. Companies that incorporate seaweed as a minor additive into fiber blends are generally commercialized but niche (TRL 7–9), while those that seek to make seaweed the dominant feedstock are in the emerging research levels (TRL 2-4; Gregersen, 2019; World Bank, 2023).  
Product type Manufacturing process Commercial examples TRL Seaweed in final product Trade-offs
Cellulosic fiber with seaweed additive Lyocell; SeaCell; Vitadylan Seaweed extract blended with wood pulp or cotton before standard viscose / Lyocell spinning SeaCell Vitadylan 7–9 Up to 10% Technically feasible and commercially proven. Low seaweed content limits ecological co-benefits. Supply chain well established.
Alginate fiber or leather Conversion to sodium alginate → liquid fraction separation → wet-spinning (fiber) or molding (leather) Smith and Nephew AQUACEL Mölnlycke Health Care Kelsun – Keel Labs MOICvegan Uncommon Alchemy 4–6 Partial inclusion Prototyping with limited commercial availability. Medical-grade wound-care products established; apparel applications remain pre-commercial. Scale-up expected within approx. 10–12 years.
Fiber blend using seaweed-based fiber Seaweed-derived fiber (e.g., SeaCell) blended with plant-based fiber prior to yarn spinning Pangaia: C-Fiber Terratela: SeaFibe PYRATEX x Seacell Ecosphere FTC Cashmere Supercarb 5–7 0.05–0.1% Small commercial availability. Very low seaweed content raises questions about meaningful ecological or health co-benefits. Blend approach reduces manufacturing risk.
Seaweed as main component To be determined — multiple experimental processing routes under active R&D Keel Labs (formerly AlgiKnit) AlgaLife 2–4 Close to 100% Significant R&D still required. Substantial seaweed feedstock volumes needed at scale. Potential human health co-benefits claimed but not yet confirmed through clinical trials. Highest ecological co-benefit potential if proven.
Table 3. Fiber product, process, commercial examples, TRL, percentage of seaweed inclusion and tradeoffs. Sources: Gregersen (2019), World Bank Report (2023)

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Environmental Co-benefits and Risks

Co-Benefits

  • Seaweed-based fiber production will require less arable/forest land, freshwater, fertilizers, and/or pesticides to grow compared to conventional fibers such as cotton and wood-based cellulose. It can also help in bioremediation efforts like ocean acidification mitigation, depending on the site of production (World Bank, 2023; Baghel et al., 2021)

Risks

Co-Benefits

  • Seaweed-based fiber production will require less arable/forest land, freshwater, fertilizers, and/or pesticides to grow compared to conventional fibers such as cotton and wood-based cellulose. It can also help in bioremediation efforts like ocean acidification mitigation, depending on the site of production (World Bank, 2023; Baghel et al., 2021)

Risks

Co-Benefits

  • Seaweed-based fiber production will require less arable/forest land, freshwater, fertilizers, and/or pesticides to grow compared to conventional fibers such as cotton and wood-based cellulose. It can also help in bioremediation efforts like ocean acidification mitigation (World Bank, 2023; Baghel et al., 2021)

Risks

Co-Benefits

  • Seaweed-based fiber production will require less arable/forest land, freshwater, fertilizers, and/or pesticides to grow compared to conventional fibers such as cotton and wood-based cellulose. It can also help in bioremediation efforts like ocean acidification mitigation (World Bank, 2023), (Baghel et al., 2021)

Risks

Co-Benefits

  • Seaweed-based fiber production will require less arable/forest land, freshwater, fertilizers, and/or pesticides to grow compared to conventional fibers such as cotton and wood-based cellulose. It can also help in bioremediation efforts like ocean acidification mitigation (World Bank, 2023), (Baghel et al., 2021)

Risks

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Social Co-benefits and Risks

Co-Benefits

  • Seaweed fibers’ blendability with other fibers allow for better integration into existing workstreams like cotton, ensuring minimal disruption to livelihoods
  • Seaweed alginate fibers have been shown to have beneficial properties for wound dressings and hygiene products, including improve absorbency, blood clotting, and cell regeneration (Dhiman & Chakraborty, 2015; Gregersen, 2019; Qin, 2008)
  • Seaweed-based fiber scale-up can create coastal jobs via local processing, biorefineries, and manufacturing; convert residues into income (“waste-to-wealth”); diversify communities’ livelihoods; and expand women’s leadership and employment (Madukhar et al., 2023; Jiang et al., 2025)
  • Seaweed-based fiber production can relieve pressure on land-use for global food security, fulfilling Sustainable Development Goals (SDG, Madukhar et al., 2023):
    • SDG 2: Zero Hunger
    • SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production

Risks

  • The industrial processes used to refine materials into fabric-grade fiber can be chemically toxic, introducing occupational hazards and job inequities. (Bojorges et al., 2023

Co-Benefits

  • Seaweed fibers’ blendability with other fibers allow for better integration into existing workstreams like cotton, ensuring minimal disruption to livelihoods
  • Seaweed alginate fibers have been shown to have beneficial properties for wound dressings and hygiene products, including improve absorbency, blood clotting, and cell regeneration (Dhiman & Chakraborty, 2015; Gregersen, 2019; Qin, 2008)
  • Seaweed-based fiber scale-up can create coastal jobs via local processing, biorefineries, and manufacturing; convert residues into income (“waste-to-wealth”); diversify communities’ livelihoods; and expand women’s leadership and employment (Madukhar et al., 2023; Jiang et al., 2025)
  • Seaweed-based fiber production can relieve pressure on land-use for global food security, fulfilling Sustainable Development Goals (SDG, Madukhar et al., 2023):
    • SDG 2: Zero Hunger
    • SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production

Risks

  • The industrial processes used to refine materials into fabric-grade fiber can be chemically toxic, introducing occupational hazards and job inequities. (Bojorges et al., 2023

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Community Perception

The seaweed fabric industry is nascent, with most activity at the pilot and experimental stage. Although early adopters describe seaweed as a vibrant, living material, the sector must cross the “valley of death” between lab innovation and commercial scale to establish long-term credibility (World Bank, 2023; Franzo et al., 2024). Seaweed’s environmental advantages in reduced land, freshwater, and pesticide use can strengthen its social license within coastal communities (Ayala et al., 2024). That trust is further supported by the potential for restorative ecosystem services and inclusive value chains that benefit marginalized groups. Sustaining this positive perception, however, will require closing awareness gaps and addressing consumer skepticism about product durability and supply-chain traceability, as well as the risks of associated industrial processes to convert the seaweed into a textile/fabric (World Bank, 2023).

The seaweed fabric industry is nascent, with most activity at the pilot and experimental stage. Although early adopters describe seaweed as a vibrant, living material, the sector must cross the “valley of death” between lab innovation and commercial scale to establish long-term credibility (World Bank, 2023; Franzo et al., 2024). Seaweed’s environmental advantages in reduced land, freshwater, and pesticide use can strengthen its social license within coastal communities (Ayala et al., 2024). That trust is further supported by the potential for restorative ecosystem services and inclusive value chains that benefit marginalized groups. Sustaining this positive perception, however, will require closing awareness gaps and addressing consumer skepticism about product durability and supply-chain traceability, as well as the risks of associated industrial processes to convert the seaweed into a textile/fabric (World Bank, 2023).
The seaweed fabric industry is nascent, with most activity at the pilot and experimental stage. Although early adopters describe seaweed as a vibrant, living material, the sector must cross the “valley of death” between lab innovation and commercial scale to establish long-term credibility (World Bank, 2023; Franzo et al., 2024). Seaweed’s core advantage—needing no arable land, freshwater, or pesticides—can strengthen its social license within coastal communities (Ayala et al., 2024). That trust is further supported by the potential for restorative ecosystem services and inclusive value chains that benefit marginalized groups. Sustaining this positive perception, however, will require closing awareness gaps and addressing consumer skepticism about product durability and supply-chain traceability (World Bank, 2023).
The seaweed fabric industry is nascent, with most activity at the pilot and experimental stage. Although early adopters describe seaweed as a vibrant, living material, the sector must cross the “valley of death” between lab innovation and commercial scale to establish long-term credibility (World Bank, 2023; Franzo et al., 2024). Seaweed’s core advantage—needing no arable land, freshwater, or pesticides—can strengthen its social license within coastal communities (Ayala et al., 2024). That trust is further supported by the potential for restorative ecosystem services and inclusive value chains that benefit marginalized groups. Sustaining this positive perception, however, will require closing awareness gaps and addressing consumer skepticism about product durability and supply-chain traceability (World Bank, 2023).

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Policy and Regulation

Version published: 

There is currently limited inclusion of seaweed-based fibers in governance and policy frameworks. To promote the scaling of seaweed-based fibers in the fabric industry, certain policies and regulations could provide market support and incentives for scaling the industry. However, some of the certifications that could promote more market support exclude parts of the workstream that are in certain regions (e.g., Fairtrade certification only applies to textiles produced in developing countries). Table 5 summarizes current policies and regulations that would apply to seaweed-based fibers.

Region Policies and regulations Applicability
Global OEKO-TEX Standard 100, STeP This regulation ensures that textiles are free from harmful substances, promoting safety for consumers and the environment
Global Vinconcette This regulation establishes a framework for responsible practices to limit negative environmental and social impacts.
Global Fairtrade International Can help market products to sustainably-inclined consumers
Global Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) Can help market products to sustainably-inclined consumers, especially in competition with cotton products which have high-carbon footprints associated with fertilizer and pesticide usage
Global Cradle to Cradle (C2C) Certified Products are evaluated based on their sustainability performance across material health, material reutilization, renewable energy and carbon management, water stewardship, and social fairness
Global ISO 14040 / ISO 14044 (LCA standards) Provide methodology and reporting requirements for life cycle assessment — critical for comparing environmental impacts of fibres. Use these to define goal & scope, functional unit, system boundaries, and data quality.
Global ASTM and ISO biodegradability tests Define compostability and test methods for industrial versus home composting
European Union REACH regulation Chemical registration and restrictions that affect processing chemicals and additives used in fiber manufacture
United States Biopreferred Guidelines and rules that govern the production, labeling, and marketing of textiles made from biological sources

Table 5. Example policies and regulations relevant to seaweed-based fibers.

There is currently limited inclusion of seaweed-based fibers in governance and policy frameworks. To promote the scaling of seaweed-based fibers in the fabric industry, certain policies and regulations could provide market support and incentives for scaling the industry. However, some of the certifications that could promote more market support exclude parts of the workstream that are in certain regions (e.g., Fairtrade certification only applies to textiles produced in developing countries). Table 5 summarizes current policies and regulations that would apply to seaweed-based fibers.
Region Policies and regulations Applicability
Global OEKO-TEX Standard 100, STeP This regulation ensures that textiles are free from harmful substances, promoting safety for consumers and the environment
Global Vinconcette This regulation establishes a framework for responsible practices to limit negative environmental and social impacts.
Global Fairtrade International Can help market products to sustainably-inclined consumers
Global Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) Can help market products to sustainably-inclined consumers, especially in competition with cotton products which have high-carbon footprints associated with fertilizer and pesticide usage
Global Cradle to Cradle (C2C) Certified Products are evaluated based on their sustainability performance across material health, material reutilization, renewable energy and carbon management, water stewardship, and social fairness
Global ISO 14040 / ISO 14044 (LCA standards) Provide methodology and reporting requirements for life cycle assessment — critical for comparing environmental impacts of fibres. Use these to define goal & scope, functional unit, system boundaries, and data quality.
Global ASTM and ISO biodegradability tests Define compostability and test methods for industrial versus home composting
European Union REACH regulation Chemical registration and restrictions that affect processing chemicals and additives used in fiber manufacture
United States Biopreferred Guidelines and rules that govern the production, labeling, and marketing of textiles made from biological sources
Table 5. Example policies and regulations relevant to seaweed-based fibers.

Projects from Ocean CDR Community

Help advance Seaweed road maps. Submit Comments or Content